Hi Jeff,
On Tuesday 26 April 2011, Jeff Trawick wrote:
has anyone played with this before? I've seen it mentioned, and
joe s had a patch to create a linger thread for worker back in
2004
the attached patch hasn't been seriously tested (or even seriously
coded)
if somebody has looked at
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
Hi Jeff,
On Tuesday 26 April 2011, Jeff Trawick wrote:
has anyone played with this before? I've seen it mentioned, and
joe s had a patch to create a linger thread for worker back in
2004
the attached patch hasn't been
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lingering close and event
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
Hi Jeff,
On Tuesday 26 April 2011, Jeff Trawick wrote:
has anyone played with this before? I've seen it mentioned, and
joe s had a patch to create a linger thread
On Monday 13 June 2011, Jeff Trawick wrote:
I have looked at limiting the maximum connections per-process for
event (see STATUS) and think that would be easier to implement if
the lingering close would be done by the listener thread. Two
questions:
Did you have a chance to work on
hey I like the concept a lot! a quick peek at
http://apache.org/server-status shows 15 Cs for threads tied up in lingering
close, something like 50 Keepalive threads, and only 13 threads actually
reading or writing.
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:53 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
has
has anyone played with this before? I've seen it mentioned, and joe s
had a patch to create a linger thread for worker back in 2004
the attached patch hasn't been seriously tested (or even seriously coded)
if somebody has looked at it seriously, perhaps you can save me some time :)
Index:
