CASTELLE Thomas wrote:
> Hello Paul (or whoever can answer me... ;-)),
>
> I just wanted to know why the patch you committed concerning mod_cache
> hasn't been introduced in Apache 2.0.47 ? Will it be in 2.0.48 ? And
> concerning the over mod_cache RFC violations, is there any news ? I can't
> see
Title: RE: [PATCH] mod_cache RFC compliance
Hello Paul (or whoever can answer me... ;-)),
I just wanted to know why the patch you committed concerning mod_cache hasn't been introduced in Apache 2.0.47 ? Will it be in 2.0.48 ? And concerning the over mod_cache RFC violations, is ther
ext apache
release...
Thanks again,
Thomas.
-Message d'origine-
De : Paul J. Reder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : mardi 17 juin 2003 05:21
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: [PATCH] mod_cache RFC compliance
I am reviewing this patch and have a few questions for Thomas or some
Title: RE: [PATCH] mod_cache RFC compliance
Thanks for looking into this Paul !
Concerning the second question, I totally agree with you. I tested it and it works. It is obviously more logical...
I hope you will be able to integrate this patch in the next apache release...
Thanks again
I am reviewing this patch and have a few questions for Thomas or someone
in the know.
The first has to do with Thomas' observation that Cache-Control is to be
found in r->err_headers_out rather than in r->headers_out... I looked into
this and ran into the following piece of code in mod_expires.c (e
Title: [PATCH] mod_cache RFC compliance
Hello,
In order to accelerate the RFC compliance of mod_cache, I propose these two patches which fix two problems :
- It doesn't handle the Cache-Control directives (max-age, max-stale, min-fresh...) properly.
- It doesn't send a "If
