Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ will soon (within the hour, upon resync) > contain the following tarballs for approval > > httpd-2.2.4.tar.bz2 [.asc|.md5] > httpd-2.2.4.tar.gz [.asc|.md5] > httpd-2.2.4-win32-src.zip [.asc|.md5] I counted 7+1, 0-1. Thanks everyone.

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > > Tom Donovan wrote: > > > > I'd vote to fix it in 2.2.4 rather than deal with the noise - but > > personally I'm happy either way since I now know the workaround. > > We won't - 2.2.4 is done. > > We could scuttle 2.2.4, but given the overwhelming improvements I'm

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

Tom Donovan wrote: > > I'd vote to fix it in 2.2.4 rather than deal with the noise - but > personally I'm happy either way since I now know the workaround. We won't - 2.2.4 is done. We could scuttle 2.2.4, but given the overwhelming improvements I'm really loathe to do that. Let 2.2.4 live, and

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

re: "start an incident at Microsoft" I'll try - but since Win2000 is in what MS calls "Extended support phase", only security bugs are accepted. I'll describe it as creatively as I can... re: "I don't see this as a showstopper" True. The Win32DisableAcceptEx directive certainly works. There

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

Tom Donovan wrote: > re: the Windows 2000 0.0.0.0 IP address problem > > Bill, > > Both solutions work. > > The Win32DisableAcceptEx directive also works to correct the problem > (without the patch). That's your bug - AcceptEx inhibits proper behavior of getpeername(), if you would like to st

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

re: the Windows 2000 0.0.0.0 IP address problem Bill, Both solutions work. Applying win32sock_is_known.patch corrects the problem for win2000. The Win32DisableAcceptEx directive also works to correct the problem (without the patch). -tom- William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: It's actually apr_os_

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

Tom Donovan wrote: > > I see that apr_os_sock_put() set remote_addr_unknown=1 in earlier APR > versions too. It's actually apr_os_sock_make() and although it set unknown=1 where there was no remote addr, it assumed unknown from alloc_socket() was 0. Try the attached patch please? Bill Index: ne

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

Tom, speculating here without a 2000 box close - would you try to DisableWin32AcceptEx please? Perhaps the flaw actually resides in how AcceptEx and GetAcceptExSockaddrs, and how they interact with the socket? Bill Tom Donovan wrote: > I have had some difficulties running 2.2.4 RC on Windows 20

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

Tom Donovan wrote: > > Perhaps it would be simpler to presume that remote_addr *is* always > known on Windows, and make sure all the Windows APR socket functions > live up to this rule. Simpler? Sure, if apr is only for httpd when AcceptEx() is in use :-/ Of course, that's not true, the impleme

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

On 6 Jan 2007, at 07:41, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ will soon (within the hour, upon resync) contain the following tarballs for approval httpd-2.2.4.tar.bz2 [.asc|.md5] httpd-2.2.4.tar.gz [.asc|.md5] httpd-2.2.4-win32-src.zip [.asc|.md5] +/-1 [ ] Releas

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

re: the Windows 2000 0.0.0.0 IP address problem A quick look through win32/sockets.c shows code to fill in remote_addr after accept() and connect(), as well as after acceptEx(). This led me to believe that "Windows has the peer name". Ditto for the win9x_*() functions in Apache server/mpm/win

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

+1, all sigs verified on Darwin Kernel Version 8.8.0 (10.4.8) powerpc powerpc-apple-darwin8-gcc-4.0.1 (GCC) 4.0.1 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 5367) All tests successful, 23 tests and 14 subtests skipped. Files=65, Tests=2078, 100 wallclock secs (48.33 cusr + 13.37 csys = 61.70 CPU) Roy

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

Tom, thanks for the analysis and bug report - your trace follows mine but the getpeername was news to me. W.R.T. httpd you made the assumption "Windows has the peer name" - which is true with AcceptEx but won't be true in any other context. This is the exception not the rule. So a couple thought

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

I have had some difficulties running 2.2.4 RC on Windows 2000. The remote IP is always seen as 0.0.0.0. Here are a few lines from my logs\access.log: 0.0.0.0 - - [07/Jan/2007:11:22:59 -0500] "GET /server-status HTTP/1.1" 403 215 0.0.0.0 - - [07/Jan/2007:11:23:36 -0500] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 200 20417

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

>>> On 1/6/2007 at 12:41 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ will soon (within the hour, upon resync) > contain the following tarballs for approval > > httpd-2.2.4.tar.bz2 [.asc|.md5] > httpd-2.2.4.tar.gz [.asc|.

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

On 1/6/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [+1] Release httpd 2.2.4 tested with worker MPM on RedHat 4/ia32 and Solaris 10/SPARC32

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

On Jan 6, 2007, at 2:41 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ will soon (within the hour, upon resync) contain the following tarballs for approval httpd-2.2.4.tar.bz2 [.asc|.md5] httpd-2.2.4.tar.gz [.asc|.md5] httpd-2.2.4-win32-src.zip [.asc|.md5] +/-1 [ ] Rel

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

On Jan 5, 2007, at 11:41 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Let the voting begin, and kick off 2.2.5 efforts. I understand Jim is still interested in RM'ing 2.2.5 later this month. The RC has been running on people.apache.org as of 1:46PM today. http://people.apache.org/server-status Nothin

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

On Jan 5, 2007, at 11:41 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ will soon (within the hour, upon resync) contain the following tarballs for approval httpd-2.2.4.tar.bz2 [.asc|.md5] httpd-2.2.4.tar.gz [.asc|.md5] httpd-2.2.4-win32-src.zip [.asc|.md5] +/-1 [ ] Re

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

On 01/07/2007 08:16 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Ruediger Pluem wrote: > >>-0 on SuSE Linux 10.1 x86_64, gcc 4.1.0 >> >>Due to the apr-util bug 41308 >>(http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41308) the 64 bit >>build does not work if a system wide 32 bit expat library is presen

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

This is a wild guess but Line 82 of makefile.win: !IF EXIST("srclib\zlib") in the win-src packaged the zlib and openssl folders exist without the files being in there. I guess this broke it. On 1/7/07, Issac Goldstand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Seems to me that the autodetection which used to

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

Seems to me that the autodetection which used to prevent mod_deflate from building on win32 unless zlib is in the srclib directory is broken. I have a vanilla unzip for the win-src, and it's failing on missing zlib headers... > On 1/6/07, *William A. Rowe, Jr.* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > -0 on SuSE Linux 10.1 x86_64, gcc 4.1.0 > > Due to the apr-util bug 41308 > (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41308) the 64 bit > build does not work if a system wide 32 bit expat library is present. Can you clarify - if you specific --with-builtin-exp

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

On 01/06/2007 08:41 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ will soon (within the hour, upon resync) > contain the following tarballs for approval > > httpd-2.2.4.tar.bz2 [.asc|.md5] .asc / .md5 OK > httpd-2.2.4.tar.gz [.asc|.md5] .asc / .md5 OK +1 on Solaris 8 /

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

. etc. Steffen - Original Message - From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 20:21 Subject: Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Gustavo Lopes wrote: No problems compiling (wi

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

where exactly did you add this in the Makefile? After some searching it does seem that the errors I' mgetting are related to missing or wrong manifest files. Line 608 of /Makefile.win. Then prepare the environment and build with "nmake -f Makefile.win PORT=80 INSTDIR="x:\path" installr" You

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Gustavo Lopes wrote: >> No problems compiling (with openssl0.9.8d and zlib1.2.3) with visual >> studio 2005 from the command line, except for the usual trouble with the >> manifest files. > > What trouble? All the libraries/exe's have a post build step that does this

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

Gustavo Lopes wrote: > No problems compiling (with openssl0.9.8d and zlib1.2.3) with visual > studio 2005 from the command line, except for the usual trouble with the > manifest files. What trouble? All the libraries/exe's have a post build step that does this. Going back to a virgin unpack of t

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

quot;William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: ; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 18:39 Subject: Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review Very true. Steffan, in order to be a community player, we prefer that you do NOT publish unreleased binar

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

where exactly did you add this in the Makefile? After some searching it does seem that the errors I' mgetting are related to missing or wrong manifest files. On 1/6/07, Gustavo Lopes <"mail:Apache"@geleia.net> wrote: No problems compiling (with openssl0.9.8d and zlib1.2.3) with visual studio 20

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

I'll give it another whack later today but from IDE this time. I'll keep you posted On 1/6/07, Gustavo Lopes <"mail:Apache"@geleia.net> wrote: No problems compiling (with openssl0.9.8d and zlib1.2.3) with visual studio 2005 from the command line, except for the usual trouble with the manifest f

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

Very true. Steffan, in order to be a community player, we prefer that you do NOT publish unreleased binaries unless you VERY CLEARLY designate them as YOUR release of the ASF's code. Even at that, it's in poor form. Because you participate here, you'll see the vote tally and know when we start t

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ will soon (within the hour, upon resync) contain the following tarballs for approval httpd-2.2.4.tar.bz2 [.asc|.md5] httpd-2.2.4.tar.gz [.asc|.md5] httpd-2.2.4-win32-src.zip [.asc|.md5] +/-1 [ ] Release httpd 2.2.4 Builds clean

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

No problems compiling (with openssl0.9.8d and zlib1.2.3) with visual studio 2005 from the command line, except for the usual trouble with the manifest files. Adding: $(MAKE) $(MAKEOPT) -f Makefile.win SHORT=$(SHORT) LONG=$(LONG) \ _copybin src_exe=exe.manifest src_dll=dll.manifest src_so=so.man

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

I added "expected" to the text. Steffen - Original Message - From: "Jeff Trawick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 16:50 Subject: Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review On 1/6/07, Steffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

On 1/6/07, Steffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Builds fine with Visual Studio 2005 Service Pack 1 It is available with SSL at the Apache Lounge: http://www.apachelounge.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1237 one note: if 2.2.4 proves to be a dud over the next few days, it won't be "released" by the AS

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

On 1/6/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ will soon (within the hour, upon resync) contain the following tarballs for approval httpd-2.2.4.tar.bz2 [.asc|.md5] httpd-2.2.4.tar.gz [.asc|.md5] httpd-2.2.4-win32-src.zip [.asc|.md5] for y'alls read

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

007 8:41 Subject: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ will soon (within the hour, upon resync) contain the following tarballs for approval httpd-2.2.4.tar.bz2 [.asc|.md5] httpd-2.2.4.tar.gz [.asc|.md5] httpd-2.2.4-win32-src.zip [.asc|.md5] +/-1 [

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

Doesn't seem to work for me. Compiles without errors just the regular warnings. But when I try to run any of the binaries I get: http://img142.imageshack.us/img142/7573/errorvs2005jp1.jpg I'm using visual studio 2005 as always. Following the same steps I've been doing since 2.2.0 I tried with an

[VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ will soon (within the hour, upon resync) contain the following tarballs for approval httpd-2.2.4.tar.bz2 [.asc|.md5] httpd-2.2.4.tar.gz [.asc|.md5] httpd-2.2.4-win32-src.zip [.asc|.md5] +/-1 [ ] Release httpd 2.2.4 Let the voting begin, and kick off 2.2.5 eff