Re: 2.0.35 binaries for Linux boxes

2002-04-08 Thread Pier Fumagalli
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Directory @@ServerRoot@@/@rel_errordir@ +Directory @rel_errordir@ Those will screw up the whole httpd.conf in some cases... You should really use @exp_..dir@... Pier

RE: 2.0.35 binaries for Linux boxes

2002-04-08 Thread GOMEZ Henri
... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 -Original Message- From: Pier Fumagalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 2:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 2.0.35 binaries for Linux boxes GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Directory

RE: 2.0.35 binaries for Linux boxes

2002-04-08 Thread GOMEZ Henri
ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 -Original Message- From: GOMEZ Henri Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 3:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 2.0.35 binaries for Linux boxes Hi Pier, I agree that many site put everything under ServerRoot, but when you specify in config.layout

RE: 2.0.35 binaries for Linux boxes

2002-04-08 Thread GOMEZ Henri
When trying to use shmcb I've got : mod_ssl cannot allocate shared memory error It works fine with dbm Any idea ? -Original Message- From: GOMEZ Henri Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 6:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 2.0.35 binaries for Linux boxes I agree that many site

Re: 2.0.35 binaries for Linux boxes

2002-04-08 Thread Pier Fumagalli
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I agree that many site put everything under ServerRoot, but when you specify in config.layout that DocumentRoot goes under /var/www2/html, you don't want to see the final httpd.conf under /etc/httpd2/var/www2/html Yeah... Ok... That's why I said to