Re: 2.0.37-dev/Solaris-8/sparc-v9

2002-06-07 Thread Jorge
X Display ? Xvfb should do it without the real thing ... Pier Fumagalli wrote: >"Aaron Bannert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 09:17:46PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote: >>

Re: 2.0.37-dev/Solaris-8/sparc-v9

2002-06-06 Thread Eli Marmor
Aaron Bannert wrote: > > > >BTW.. you do know that 64bit programs take a ~10% hit in performance > > >don't you? > > Why's this? Because of various reasons. Maybe the major of them, is the size of used memory: Memory usage is higher, because of default sizes of various types, alignments, etc.

Re: 2.0.37-dev/Solaris-8/sparc-v9

2002-06-06 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Ian Holsman wrote: > > BTW.. you do know that 64bit programs take a ~10% hit in performance > don't you? The JVM seems a lot faster (perceived performance, no actual data on hand) at 64 bits rather than 32... Pier

Re: 2.0.37-dev/Solaris-8/sparc-v9

2002-06-06 Thread Aaron Bannert
> >BTW.. you do know that 64bit programs take a ~10% hit in performance > >don't you? Why's this? -aaron

Re: 2.0.37-dev/Solaris-8/sparc-v9

2002-06-06 Thread jean-frederic clere
Ian Holsman wrote: > jean-frederic clere wrote: > >> Jeff Trawick wrote: >> >>> Pier Fumagalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> >>> >>> I'm about to attempt to build Apache 2.0.37-dev at 64 bits with the Sun C compiler (kindly donated by Sun), on Nagoya (worker MPM). Anything I >>

Re: 2.0.37-dev/Solaris-8/sparc-v9

2002-06-06 Thread jean-frederic clere
Jeff Trawick wrote: > Pier Fumagalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >>I'm about to attempt to build Apache 2.0.37-dev at 64 bits with the Sun C >>compiler (kindly donated by Sun), on Nagoya (worker MPM). Anything I should >>be aware of? I'll report back on how the baby flies (if it does)... >

Re: 2.0.37-dev/Solaris-8/sparc-v9

2002-06-05 Thread Pier Fumagalli
"Aaron Bannert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 09:17:46PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> Pier Fumagalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> I'm about to attempt to build Apache 2.0.37-dev at 64 bits with the Sun C >>> compiler (kindly donated by Sun), on Nagoya (worker MPM).

Re: 2.0.37-dev/Solaris-8/sparc-v9

2002-06-05 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 09:17:46PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote: > Pier Fumagalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I'm about to attempt to build Apache 2.0.37-dev at 64 bits with the Sun C > > compiler (kindly donated by Sun), on Nagoya (worker MPM). Anything I should > > be aware of? I'll report b

Re: 2.0.37-dev/Solaris-8/sparc-v9

2002-06-05 Thread Jeff Trawick
Pier Fumagalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm about to attempt to build Apache 2.0.37-dev at 64 bits with the Sun C > compiler (kindly donated by Sun), on Nagoya (worker MPM). Anything I should > be aware of? I'll report back on how the baby flies (if it does)... There is an open PR about a 6

2.0.37-dev/Solaris-8/sparc-v9

2002-06-05 Thread Pier Fumagalli
I'm about to attempt to build Apache 2.0.37-dev at 64 bits with the Sun C compiler (kindly donated by Sun), on Nagoya (worker MPM). Anything I should be aware of? I'll report back on how the baby flies (if it does)... Pier -- [Perl] combines all the worst aspects of C and Lisp: a billion of