Re: 2007 DST changes, and a "non-issue" statement...

2007-01-26 Thread Jeff Trawick
On 1/26/07, Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Apache httpd and bundled libraries do not maintain their own time > >> zone information. Instead, information is retrieved from the > >> operating system. Relevant operating system updates must be > >> applied and the web server restarted to

Re: 2007 DST changes, and a "non-issue" statement...

2007-01-26 Thread Nick Kew
> >> Apache httpd and bundled libraries do not maintain their own time > >> zone information. Instead, information is retrieved from the > >> operating system. Relevant operating system updates must be > >> applied and the web server restarted to prevent potential time > >> display problems with

Re: 2007 DST changes, and a "non-issue" statement...

2007-01-25 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Jim Jagielski wrote: > Jeff Trawick wrote: >> Is there anything to say other than (for httpd, for example): >> >> Apache httpd and bundled libraries do not maintain their own time zone >> information. Instead, information is retrieved from the operating >> system. Relevant operating system update

Re: 2007 DST changes, and a "non-issue" statement...

2007-01-25 Thread Jim Jagielski
Jeff Trawick wrote: > > Is there anything to say other than (for httpd, for example): > > Apache httpd and bundled libraries do not maintain their own time zone > information. Instead, information is retrieved from the operating > system. Relevant operating system updates must be applied and th

Re: 2007 DST changes, and a "non-issue" statement...

2007-01-25 Thread Jeff Trawick
On 1/25/07, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We did it with Y2K so +1... Is there anything to say other than (for httpd, for example): Apache httpd and bundled libraries do not maintain their own time zone information. Instead, information is retrieved from the operating system. Rele

Re: 2007 DST changes, and a "non-issue" statement...

2007-01-25 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Jan 24, 2007, at 6:43 PM, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote: On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 05:28:49PM -0500, Victor J. Orlikowski wrote: I've been getting some questions (from my new employer) on the impact of the upcoming Daylight Saving Time issues for the httpd. My natural response was: "There are none

Re: 2007 DST changes, and a "non-issue" statement...

2007-01-25 Thread Jim Jagielski
We did it with Y2K so +1... I've been seeing a *huge* increase in these questions as well. On Jan 24, 2007, at 5:28 PM, Victor J. Orlikowski wrote: Long time, no speak on my behalf. I hope to be changing that soon. So - to de-cloak: I've been getting some questions (from my new employer) on

Re: 2007 DST changes, and a "non-issue" statement...

2007-01-24 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 05:28:49PM -0500, Victor J. Orlikowski wrote: > I've been getting some questions (from my new employer) on the > impact of the upcoming Daylight Saving Time issues for the httpd. > > My natural response was: "There are none! It's an OS issue." Whatever about DST, this remi

Re: 2007 DST changes, and a "non-issue" statement...

2007-01-24 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Victor J. Orlikowski wrote: > > Whereupon, I was told that upper management would prefer to have > something rather more "official" than my word on it. Ok, you offer them one :) ASF projects make no warranties. If you want to dredge up the old Y2K comments from the site svn history it's probabl

2007 DST changes, and a "non-issue" statement...

2007-01-24 Thread Victor J. Orlikowski
Long time, no speak on my behalf. I hope to be changing that soon. So - to de-cloak: I've been getting some questions (from my new employer) on the impact of the upcoming Daylight Saving Time issues for the httpd. My natural response was: "There are none! It's an OS issue." Whereupon, I was told