Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
If you want to completely rip apart libtool and write your own, feel
free. Been there, done that, got the t-shirt. -- justin
This is one reason I build mod_deflate and others on its own:
apxs -cia -lz mod_deflate.c
--
Brian Akins
Lead Systems Engineer
CNN Internet
* Joe Orton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 03:18:48PM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > --On January 3, 2006 11:09:34 PM + Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >That is of course resolved by LoadFile /lib/libz.so, which is what I
> > >contend should be standard
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 01:40:11AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 08:54:01AM +, Joe Orton wrote:
> > > Again, there are substantial libtool issues that come into play that
> > > limit
> > > what we can realistically do.
> >
> > I don't see any here. 2.2.x links on
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 08:54:01AM +, Joe Orton wrote:
Again, there are substantial libtool issues that come into play that limit
what we can realistically do.
I don't see any here. 2.2.x links only mod_deflate against -lz and only
mod_ssl against $(SSL_LIBS).
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 08:54:01AM +, Joe Orton wrote:
> > Again, there are substantial libtool issues that come into play that limit
> > what we can realistically do.
>
> I don't see any here. 2.2.x links only mod_deflate against -lz and only
> mod_ssl against $(SSL_LIBS). The 2.0.x way o
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 03:18:48PM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> --On January 3, 2006 11:09:34 PM + Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >That is of course resolved by LoadFile /lib/libz.so, which is what I
> >contend should be standard practice. So when another module
> >relies on lib
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 12:12:18AM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> >
> >Nice idea, but libtool doesn't support any of this in a portable manner
> >- some OSes support DSOs having their own dependencies, a number just
> >don't.
>
> Name a few? Or one?
In my exper
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Nice idea, but libtool doesn't support any of this in a portable manner
- some OSes support DSOs having their own dependencies, a number just
don't.
Name a few? Or one?
Brian Akins wrote:
Nick Kew wrote:
Amongst modules, we should apply the same principle: e.g.
with mod_deflate and zlib.
Or why not just have mod_deflate link against zlib and not have httpd do
it. SSL seems to be the worst culprit. httpd gets linked against tons
of stuff so that I cannot
--On January 3, 2006 11:09:34 PM + Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That is of course resolved by LoadFile /lib/libz.so, which is what I
contend should be standard practice. So when another module
relies on libz, there's no side effect that manifests mysteriously
according to whether and
On Tuesday 03 January 2006 15:13, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> Nick Kew wrote:
> > How about modularised dependencies as a goal for 2.4?
>
> I agree with the idea, but I don't really think theres that manu
> libraries linked in...
>
> I've got a 2.0.55 with mp2, php4, ssl, ruby, python, mod_log_sql
On Tuesday 03 January 2006 15:18, Brian Akins wrote:
> Nick Kew wrote:
> > Amongst modules, we should apply the same principle: e.g.
> > with mod_deflate and zlib.
>
> Or why not just have mod_deflate link against zlib and not have httpd do
> it.
It does that now - if built from ./configure. That
--On January 3, 2006 10:18:06 AM -0500 Brian Akins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Nick Kew wrote:
Amongst modules, we should apply the same principle: e.g.
with mod_deflate and zlib.
Or why not just have mod_deflate link against zlib and not have httpd do
it. SSL seems to be the worst culprit.
Nick Kew wrote:
Amongst modules, we should apply the same principle: e.g.
with mod_deflate and zlib.
Or why not just have mod_deflate link against zlib and not have httpd do
it. SSL seems to be the worst culprit. httpd gets linked against tons
of stuff so that I cannot copy the binary to a
Nick Kew wrote:
How about modularised dependencies as a goal for 2.4?
I agree with the idea, but I don't really think theres that manu
libraries linked in...
I've got a 2.0.55 with mp2, php4, ssl, ruby, python, mod_log_sql
using a slew of config IfDevines, each server runs only what it needs.
Running ldd on the curent httpd on my desktop - like anywhere else -
shows an alarming number of libraries. This is IMO a Bad Thing.
In sharp contrast, httpd -l lists just the basic four "compiled in modules".
This is IMO a Good Thing.
Whenever I write a module that requires an external library,
16 matches
Mail list logo
