"Roy T. Fielding" wrote:
> It can fail however it likes -- transparent gateways are not allowed in HTTP.
> Once you violate the protocol, you are doomed to any number of unspecified
> workarounds that will ultimately fail outside the common case.
Makes sense.
Regards,
Graham
--
---
> But in theory this could also happen with HTTP/1.0 if a client asks for
> /blah and doesn't include a host header - in this case the gateway has
> no way of figuring out who to connect to, and must fail as I understand
> it with "505 Upgrade Dammnit". Am I right?
It can fail however it likes --
"Roy T. Fielding" wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 09:25:24PM -0500, Chuck Murcko wrote:
> > So as Graham said proxy should reply 501 or 505 right?
>
> It doesn't matter -- HTTP/0.9 responses don't have error codes.
> You just have to return an HTML page that tells the user to get out
> of their
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 09:25:24PM -0500, Chuck Murcko wrote:
> So as Graham said proxy should reply 501 or 505 right?
It doesn't matter -- HTTP/0.9 responses don't have error codes.
You just have to return an HTML page that tells the user to get out
of their rocking chair and upgrade the client
So as Graham said proxy should reply 501 or 505 right?
Chuck
On Tuesday, January 29, 2002, at 05:47 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>> On the proxy list there is talk of support for transparent-proxy
>> behaviour, and the question has come up "what about HTTP/0.9?". Am I
>> correct in saying it is n
> On the proxy list there is talk of support for transparent-proxy
> behaviour, and the question has come up "what about HTTP/0.9?". Am I
> correct in saying it is not possible to find the destination server if
> the protocol is v0.9 or v1.0, and there is no host header, and there is
> no complete
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 12:35:58AM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
>
> On the proxy list there is talk of support for transparent-proxy
> behaviour, and the question has come up "what about HTTP/0.9?". Am I
> correct in saying it is not possible to find the destination server if
> the protocol is v0
Graham Leggett wrote:
> On the proxy list there is talk of support for transparent-proxy
> behaviour, and the question has come up "what about HTTP/0.9?". Am I
> correct in saying it is not possible to find the destination server if
> the protocol is v0.9 or v1.0, and there is no host header, and
Hi all,
On the proxy list there is talk of support for transparent-proxy
behaviour, and the question has come up "what about HTTP/0.9?". Am I
correct in saying it is not possible to find the destination server if
the protocol is v0.9 or v1.0, and there is no host header, and there is
no complete
