Re: Why bundling 3rd-party packages anyway ? [WAS: A zLib Update....?]

2004-12-14 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* André Malo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Enrico Weigelt wrote: * André Malo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Enrico Weigelt wrote: Why is pcre bundled anyway ? Other packages (ie zlib or expat) are also not bundled, so why pcre ? vendor branch. how does it answer my question ?

Re: Why bundling 3rd-party packages anyway ? [WAS: A zLib Update....?]

2004-12-13 Thread André Malo
* Enrico Weigelt wrote: Why is pcre bundled anyway ? Other packages (ie zlib or expat) are also not bundled, so why pcre ? vendor branch. nd

Re: Why bundling 3rd-party packages anyway ? [WAS: A zLib Update....?]

2004-12-13 Thread Richard Jones
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 05:43:58AM +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote: * Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: big_snip / Hi folks, Why bundling 3rd-party packages anyway ?! I personally *always* use sysetm libs instead of bundled libs when some packages do such bundling. But I'm really

Re: Why bundling 3rd-party packages anyway ? [WAS: A zLib Update....?]

2004-12-13 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Richard Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why is pcre bundled anyway ? Other packages (ie zlib or expat) are also not bundled, so why pcre ? http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27550 Doesnt answer the question, instead clearly showing in what trouble we run when doing such

Re: Why bundling 3rd-party packages anyway ? [WAS: A zLib Update....?]

2004-12-13 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* André Malo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Enrico Weigelt wrote: Why is pcre bundled anyway ? Other packages (ie zlib or expat) are also not bundled, so why pcre ? vendor branch. how does it answer my question ? cu -- -

Re: Why bundling 3rd-party packages anyway ? [WAS: A zLib Update....?]

2004-12-13 Thread André Malo
* Enrico Weigelt wrote: * André Malo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Enrico Weigelt wrote: Why is pcre bundled anyway ? Other packages (ie zlib or expat) are also not bundled, so why pcre ? vendor branch. how does it answer my question ? It gives you a piece of information, that you

Why bundling 3rd-party packages anyway ? [WAS: A zLib Update....?]

2004-12-12 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: big_snip / Hi folks, Why bundling 3rd-party packages anyway ?! I personally *always* use sysetm libs instead of bundled libs when some packages do such bundling. But I'm really unhappy that apache2's configure does not provide an option for doing that

Re: A zLib Update....?

2004-11-30 Thread NormW
Justin Erenkrantz wrote: --On Tuesday, November 30, 2004 6:53 PM +1100 NormW [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With the recent upgrade of PCRE for Apache 2.1.x, I was curious if zLib (required for mod_deflate) is mandated at 1.1.4 or could it also be 'updated' to the 1.2.1 release (available since

Re: A zLib Update....?

2004-11-30 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 01:57 AM 11/30/2004, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: --On Tuesday, November 30, 2004 6:53 PM +1100 NormW [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With the recent upgrade of PCRE for Apache 2.1.x, I was curious if zLib (required for mod_deflate) is mandated at 1.1.4 or could it also be 'updated' to the 1.2.1 release

Re: A zLib Update....?

2004-11-30 Thread Brad Nicholes
NetWare builds against either 1.1.x or 1.2.x. It just depends on where you point the ZLIBSDK environment variable at compile time. Brad [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tuesday, November 30, 2004 6:52:58 AM At 01:57 AM 11/30/2004, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: --On Tuesday, November 30, 2004 6:53 PM +1100

A zLib Update....?

2004-11-29 Thread NormW
Greetings All. With the recent upgrade of PCRE for Apache 2.1.x, I was curious if zLib (required for mod_deflate) is mandated at 1.1.4 or could it also be 'updated' to the 1.2.1 release (available since Nov'03). A 2.1 build on Windows for NetWare shows it glues together without issue; are

Re: A zLib Update....?

2004-11-29 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Tuesday, November 30, 2004 6:53 PM +1100 NormW [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With the recent upgrade of PCRE for Apache 2.1.x, I was curious if zLib (required for mod_deflate) is mandated at 1.1.4 or could it also be 'updated' to the 1.2.1 release (available since Nov'03). A 2.1 build on Windows