> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09.10.2002 10:14:58 >>>
>Andre Schild wrote:
>> What about renaming util_ldap.c to mod_ldap.c ?
>Is it that important for now? I think lets rather worry about this
when
>mod_auth_ldap gets fitted to the new authn/authz framework. Then we
will
>be renaming a whole bunch of stu
Andre Schild wrote:
> Here the updates.
> The apr_ldap.hw goes in the apr-util/include, as it isn't automaticaly
> generated for windows.
Ok.
> What about renaming util_ldap.c to mod_ldap.c ?
> Would make the naming of the files/modules more consistent,
> but on the other hand break the build p
Here the updates.
The apr_ldap.hw goes in the apr-util/include, as it isn't automaticaly
generated for windows.
What about renaming util_ldap.c to mod_ldap.c ?
Would make the naming of the files/modules more consistent,
but on the other hand break the build process for all
platforms.
But if we