Re: Any vetos on releasing 1.3.24...

2002-02-05 Thread Jim Jagielski
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > > * On 2002-02-05 at 16:42, > Bill Stoddard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> excited the electrons to say: > > > > I am really against letting this XP issue hold up the 1.3.24 release. > > What's the reason for *not* waiting? In what way did 1.3.23 regress? > (I.e., what d

Re: Any vetos on releasing 1.3.24...

2002-02-05 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: "Bill Stoddard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 3:47 PM > I am really against letting this XP issue hold up the 1.3.24 release. Allan Edwards >has > been able to reproduce the problem and it is looking more and more like an XP bug. >We > send a buffer full of "A"'s

Re: Any vetos on releasing 1.3.24...

2002-02-05 Thread Jim Jagielski
At 3:17 PM -0600 2/5/02, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >From: "Jim Jagielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 3:09 PM > > >> I'm still gunning to t/r and release 1.3.24 within the week. If this >> creates heartburn for anyone, speak up now. > >Jim, > > I'm suspicious that what

Re: Any vetos on releasing 1.3.24...

2002-02-05 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
* On 2002-02-05 at 16:42, Bill Stoddard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> excited the electrons to say: > > I am really against letting this XP issue hold up the 1.3.24 release. What's the reason for *not* waiting? In what way did 1.3.23 regress? (I.e., what deadly bug is in 1.3.23 that wasn't in 1.3.22?)

Re: Any vetos on releasing 1.3.24...

2002-02-05 Thread Bill Stoddard
I am really against letting this XP issue hold up the 1.3.24 release. Allan Edwards has been able to reproduce the problem and it is looking more and more like an XP bug. We send a buffer full of "A"'s on the send and the network gets an equal number of trashed bytes. In the unlikely case it t

RE: Any vetos on releasing 1.3.24...

2002-02-05 Thread Ryan Bloom
> -Original Message- > From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:18 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Any vetos on releasing 1.3.24... > > From: "Jim Jagielski" <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Any vetos on releasing 1.3.24...

2002-02-05 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: "Jim Jagielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 3:09 PM > I'm still gunning to t/r and release 1.3.24 within the week. If this > creates heartburn for anyone, speak up now. Jim, I'm suspicious that whatever bug we hit on 2.0 with XP services is the same bug as th

Any vetos on releasing 1.3.24...

2002-02-05 Thread Jim Jagielski
I'm still gunning to t/r and release 1.3.24 within the week. If this creates heartburn for anyone, speak up now. -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will tra