Let us take one quick glance at some things, and perhaps this will help make
sense to all as well.
* As already stated, release plans != tag methods.
* Code can always move forward, that's what CVS and a dev tree, and a build
manager are for.
* Without good published guidlines on HOW one should
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 02:14:56PM -0700, Greg Stein wrote:
> For example, we're still finding interesting things to do with the brigades.
> We're still refining their functionality. We've got architecture issues with
> input filtering. And that is just one piece of the code.
Yeah, this leads me
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 01:54:26PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > To me, a useful release plan is one that:
> > * tells developers working on httpd-2.0 what the important things to
> > work on for 2.0-GA are,
> > * tells 3rd-party module developers what sort of interface they can
> > exp
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 01:45:32PM -0700, Brian Pane wrote:
>...
> To me, a useful release plan is one that:
> * tells developers working on httpd-2.0 what the important things to
> work on for 2.0-GA are,
And the developers will continue to work on what they *want* to work on.
There is no
On Monday 24 September 2001 01:45 pm, Brian Pane wrote:
> Ryan Bloom wrote:
> >On Monday 24 September 2001 01:27 pm, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> >>On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 02:49:08PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> >>>Yup, that's the ticket. For 2.1 development. If we keep this up, there
> >>
Ryan Bloom wrote:
>On Monday 24 September 2001 01:27 pm, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
>>On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 02:49:08PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>
>>>Yup, that's the ticket. For 2.1 development. If we keep this up, there
>>>will never be a 2.0 release this year :(
>>>
>>You know, we
On Monday 24 September 2001 01:27 pm, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 02:49:08PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > Yup, that's the ticket. For 2.1 development. If we keep this up, there
> > will never be a 2.0 release this year :(
>
> You know, we should come up with a *R
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 02:49:08PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Yup, that's the ticket. For 2.1 development. If we keep this up, there will
> never be a 2.0 release this year :(
You know, we should come up with a *RELEASE PLAN* like the Tomcat
people do.
I've said it before (it was l
