Re: Are we +1 for 1.3.26 and 2.0.38?

2002-06-18 Thread Pier Fumagalli
"William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 06:02 PM 6/18/2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >> Fast feedback to irc://irc.openprojects.net/#apr channel, or simply reply >> here. >> This isn't a long vote, say, the next 15-30 minutes. > > jwoolley, pier, brian pane, (me) all +1 by IRC

Re: Are we +1 for 1.3.26 and 2.0.38?

2002-06-18 Thread Brad Nicholes
The following patch has been checked in to fix the -f parameter. --- http_main.c Tue Jun 18 17:25:26 2002 +++ \projects\apache_1.3.25\src\main\http_main.cTue Jun 04 22:53:16 2002 @@ -7260,7 +7260,7 @@ while ((c = getopt(argc, argv, "D:C:c:Xd:f:vVlLz:Z:wiuStThk:n:W:")) != -1) { #el

Re: Are we +1 for 1.3.26 and 2.0.38?

2002-06-18 Thread Brad Nicholes
I don't think that it is just NetWare that is broken. Any other platform besides WIN32 that compiles this same code is also broken. I can certainly do what you suggested but I think there will be other platforms affected as well. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the l

Re: Are we +1 for 1.3.26 and 2.0.38?

2002-06-18 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 06:15 PM 6/18/2002, you wrote: >-1 for 1.3.26. The -f parameter appears to be broken at least on >NetWare. The addition of the 'F' (uppercase) parameter in the argument >list of getopt() looks like it is conflicting with the 'f' (lowercase) >parameter. When I remove the 'F' parameter, -f sta

Re: Are we +1 for 1.3.26 and 2.0.38?

2002-06-18 Thread Brad Nicholes
-1 for 1.3.26. The -f parameter appears to be broken at least on NetWare. The addition of the 'F' (uppercase) parameter in the argument list of getopt() looks like it is conflicting with the 'f' (lowercase) parameter. When I remove the 'F' parameter, -f starts working again. I'm still looking

Re: Are we +1 for 1.3.26 and 2.0.38?

2002-06-18 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 06:02 PM 6/18/2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >Fast feedback to irc://irc.openprojects.net/#apr channel, or simply reply >here. >This isn't a long vote, say, the next 15-30 minutes. jwoolley, pier, brian pane, (me) all +1 by IRC Continuing the tally for a few more minutes.

Are we +1 for 1.3.26 and 2.0.38?

2002-06-18 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Fast feedback to irc://irc.openprojects.net/#apr channel, or simply reply here. This isn't a long vote, say, the next 15-30 minutes. The files were all synced by 4:30 pm, not sufficient for the mirrors, but as good as we are going to get to put these releases in eager users' hands. Bill