I finally got our load-generating machine to work properly.
Here are some benchmarks comparing v29 with v30 of apache
http://webperf.org/a2/caw/29/caw.html
http://webperf.org/a2/caw/30/caw.html
The test consists of the test grabbing a random (but identical) outer
page which include the same s
> From: Ian Holsman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 21 December 2001 23:16
Hi,
> I finally got our load-generating machine to work properly.
>
> Here are some benchmarks comparing v29 with v30 of apache
>
> http://webperf.org/a2/caw/29/caw.html
> http://webperf.org/a2/caw/30/caw.html
Thank
"Sander Striker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ian, could you please explain in words what these results mean?
okay, maybe I won't feel quite so stupid now :)
--
Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP public key at web site:
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
The transaction stats were what jumped out at me - 7% increase in failed
connections doesn't sound good to me :( But, then maybe I'm reading that
wrong?
david
> "Sander Striker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Ian, could you please explain in words what these results mean?
>
> okay, maybe I w
> From: David Reid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 22 December 2001 13:57
> The transaction stats were what jumped out at me - 7% increase in failed
> connections doesn't sound good to me :( But, then maybe I'm reading that
> wrong?
Which is what I saw first too. But when I talked to Ian ov
he overall succesful number of completions to be a bad
thing, not a good thing??
david
- Original Message -
From: "Sander Striker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 1:02 PM
Subject: RE: Benchmark: 29 vs 30
> > Fro
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 02:15:37PM -0800, Ian Holsman wrote:
> I finally got our load-generating machine to work properly.
>
> Here are some benchmarks comparing v29 with v30 of apache
>
> http://webperf.org/a2/caw/29/caw.html
> http://webperf.org/a2/caw/30/caw.html
Having some problems with th
On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 02:02:53PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote:
> > From: David Reid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 22 December 2001 13:57
>
> > The transaction stats were what jumped out at me - 7% increase in failed
> > connections doesn't sound good to me :( But, then maybe I'm reading
Aaron Bannert wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 02:02:53PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote:
>
>>>From: David Reid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>>Sent: 22 December 2001 13:57
>>>
>>>The transaction stats were what jumped out at me - 7% increase in failed
>>>connections doesn't sound good to me :( But,
Aaron Bannert wrote:
>
> Having some problems with the images, I think the spaces are freaking
> out my Linux/Netscape browser.
Indeed. Embedded spaces are illegal; the page that links to
the images needs to use encoding like 'Transport%20Error%20Analysis.gif'.
Curiously enough, '%20' encoding
10 matches
Mail list logo
