Branching and release scheduling

2004-11-16 Thread Manoj Kasichainula
We had a good discussion over lunch today on our release processes and how to have stable releases while making new feature development as fun and easy for the geeks as possible. The main branch is always the development branch, with new features added whenever people see fit. There is never a

Re: Branching and release scheduling

2004-11-16 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Nov 16, 2004, at 3:16 PM, Manoj Kasichainula wrote: We had a good discussion over lunch today on our release processes and how to have stable releases while making new feature development as fun and easy for the geeks as possible. The is a purely personal POV, and I'm wishing I was at the

Re: Branching and release scheduling

2004-11-16 Thread Manoj Kasichainula
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 06:16:18PM -0500, Me at IO wrote: I think I included all the appropriate details, but the picture is probably clearer. Rich Bowen took it, and I moved it to save his bandwidth: http://www.apache.org/~manoj/dscn2804.jpg I missed discussing how APR fits in this scheme. The

Re: Branching and release scheduling

2004-11-16 Thread Brad Nicholes
I have to agree with Jim. Well put! Brad [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tuesday, November 16, 2004 5:55:04 PM On Nov 16, 2004, at 3:16 PM, Manoj Kasichainula wrote: We had a good discussion over lunch today on our release processes and how to have stable releases while making new feature development

Re: Branching and release scheduling

2004-11-16 Thread Leif W
On: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 07:55:13 PM EST, Jim Jagielski wrote On Nov 16, 2004, at 3:16 PM, Manoj Kasichainula wrote: We had a good discussion over lunch today on our release processes and how to have stable releases while making new feature development as fun and easy for the geeks as