Re: Bug 57227 - Patch still not in main stream

2016-02-29 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> On Feb 29, 2016, at 7:43 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Bruno Raoult wrote: >>> >>> I did find a bug in mod_autoindex more than one year

Re: Bug 57227 - Patch still not in main stream

2016-02-29 Thread Jim Jagielski
> On Feb 29, 2016, at 7:43 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > > Hi, > > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Bruno Raoult wrote: >> >> I did find a bug in mod_autoindex more than one year ago, about missing CSS >> class, and proposed a patch at same time >>

Re: Bug 57227 - Patch still not in main stream

2016-02-29 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Bruno Raoult wrote: >> >> In order to find out by myself next time, how did you jump from r1648201 >> (which I >> found from my bug/patch report) to r1651644 and then

Re: Bug 57227 - Patch still not in main stream

2016-02-29 Thread Yann Ylavic
[CCing the original bugs@ list and dev@ which I somehow added from my first response. Not sure bugs@ is to be addressed directly though, it is normally CCed for bugzilla reports only...] On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Bruno Raoult wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 1:31 PM,

Re: Bug 57227 - Patch still not in main stream

2016-02-29 Thread Yann Ylavic
Hi, On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Bruno Raoult wrote: > > I did find a bug in mod_autoindex more than one year ago, about missing CSS > class, and proposed a patch at same time > (https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57227). > It appears that this patch is still