Re: DisableReuse for mod_proxy

2008-02-14 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Nick Kew wrote: On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:27:26 -0500 Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +This helps in various situations where a firewall between Apache and +the backend server (irregardless of protocol) tends to silently irregardless??? Regardless? or irrespective? (which is

DisableReuse for mod_proxy

2008-02-13 Thread Jim Jagielski
I added something similar to mod_jk quite awhile ago, and I'm trying to get mod_jk and mod_proxy closer to parity, esp for those using AJP. So with that in mind, comments on the below?? Index: docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy.xml === ---

Re: DisableReuse for mod_proxy

2008-02-13 Thread Erik Abele
On 13.02.2008, at 16:27, Jim Jagielski wrote: I added something similar to mod_jk quite awhile ago, and I'm trying to get mod_jk and mod_proxy closer to parity, esp for those using AJP. So with that in mind, comments on the below?? Index: docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy.xml

Re: DisableReuse for mod_proxy

2008-02-13 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Feb 13, 2008, at 10:45 AM, Erik Abele wrote: On 13.02.2008, at 16:27, Jim Jagielski wrote: I added something similar to mod_jk quite awhile ago, and I'm trying to get mod_jk and mod_proxy closer to parity, esp for those using AJP. So with that in mind, comments on the below?? Index:

Re: DisableReuse for mod_proxy

2008-02-13 Thread Nick Kew
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:18:04 -0500 Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I consider it a Good Sign when the comments are mostly about the docs and how to better wordsmith them :) :-) Not quite sure what problem you're solving, but I accept you have a reason. But putting the docs first in

Re: DisableReuse for mod_proxy

2008-02-13 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Feb 13, 2008, at 1:22 PM, Nick Kew wrote: On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:18:04 -0500 Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I consider it a Good Sign when the comments are mostly about the docs and how to better wordsmith them :) :-) Not quite sure what problem you're solving, but I accept you

Re: DisableReuse for mod_proxy

2008-02-13 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Feb 13, 2008, at 1:13 PM, Nick Kew wrote: On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:27:26 -0500 Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +This helps in various situations where a firewall between Apache and +the backend server (irregardless of protocol) tends to silently irregardless??? Regardless?

Re: DisableReuse for mod_proxy

2008-02-13 Thread Nick Kew
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:27:26 -0500 Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +This helps in various situations where a firewall between Apache and +the backend server (irregardless of protocol) tends to silently irregardless??? Regardless? +drop connections. To prevent mod_proxy