FW: Older version of apache2

2002-11-26 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Folks, given that httpd is "mirrored worldwide" and not all mirrors are actually rsyincing the ".old" directory (or anything that starts with a . for what that matters), can you change the link in "README.html" to point to "http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/.old"; instead of just a relative to ".ol

Re: FW: Older version of apache2

2002-11-26 Thread Aaron Bannert
What's in that directory? I'm getting a 404. -aaron On Tuesday, November 26, 2002, at 04:20 AM, Pier Fumagalli wrote: Folks, given that httpd is "mirrored worldwide" and not all mirrors are actually rsyincing the ".old" directory (or anything that starts with a . for what that matters), can

Re: FW: Older version of apache2

2002-11-26 Thread Joshua Slive
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote: > Folks, given that httpd is "mirrored worldwide" and not all mirrors are > actually rsyincing the ".old" directory (or anything that starts with a . > for what that matters), can you change the link in "README.html" to point to > "http://www.apache.org

Re: FW: Older version of apache2

2002-11-26 Thread Aaron Bannert
Oh, and for the record, moving files into .old/ directories is evil for rsync. :) (This isn't directed at Pier) Moving files around causes rsync to do a delete and then re-download the moved files/directories. -aaron On Tuesday, November 26, 2002, at 08:07 AM, Aaron Bannert wrote: What's in t

Re: FW: Older version of apache2

2002-11-26 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 10:13 AM 11/26/2002, Joshua Slive wrote: >On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote: > >> Folks, given that httpd is "mirrored worldwide" and not all mirrors are >> actually rsyincing the ".old" directory (or anything that starts with a . >> for what that matters), can you change the link in "

Re: FW: Older version of apache2

2002-11-26 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 10:14 AM 11/26/2002, Aaron Bannert wrote: >Oh, and for the record, moving files into .old/ directories is >evil for rsync. :) (This isn't directed at Pier) Moving files >around causes rsync to do a delete and then re-download the >moved files/directories. So you suggest initially populating old

RE: FW: Older version of apache2

2002-11-26 Thread Sander Striker
> From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 26 November 2002 18:26 > At 10:14 AM 11/26/2002, Aaron Bannert wrote: > >Oh, and for the record, moving files into .old/ directories is > >evil for rsync. :) (This isn't directed at Pier) Moving files > >around causes rsync to do a de

Re: FW: Older version of apache2

2002-11-26 Thread Aaron Bannert
I already outlined a better solution on [EMAIL PROTECTED], and I believe Justin just condensed all the ideas out there into one big doc, so I'll defer to that. I think you have it right, but I would say: - put all the dist-able files into their final destination directories - symlink to the curren

Re: FW: Older version of apache2

2002-11-26 Thread Roy T. Fielding
So you suggest initially populating old/ and then symlinking the now-current version in the main download directory at the old/ target, instead? It would still initially download the package twice, and then simply unlink it later on, right? Or what's the right approach here? I suggest moving th

RE: FW: Older version of apache2

2002-11-27 Thread Sander Striker
> From: Roy T. Fielding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 26 November 2002 22:28 >> So you suggest initially populating old/ and then symlinking the >> now-current version in the main download directory at the old/ >> target, instead? It would still initially download the package >> twice, and t

Re: FW: Older version of apache2

2002-11-27 Thread Anthony Jewell
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > Subject: Re: FW: Older version of apache2 > > So you suggest initially populating old/ and then symlinking the > now-current version in the main download directory at the old/ > target, instead? It would still initially download the