Folks, given that httpd is "mirrored worldwide" and not all mirrors are
actually rsyincing the ".old" directory (or anything that starts with a .
for what that matters), can you change the link in "README.html" to point to
"http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/.old"; instead of just a relative to
".ol
What's in that directory? I'm getting a 404.
-aaron
On Tuesday, November 26, 2002, at 04:20 AM, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Folks, given that httpd is "mirrored worldwide" and not all mirrors
are
actually rsyincing the ".old" directory (or anything that starts with
a .
for what that matters), can
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> Folks, given that httpd is "mirrored worldwide" and not all mirrors are
> actually rsyincing the ".old" directory (or anything that starts with a .
> for what that matters), can you change the link in "README.html" to point to
> "http://www.apache.org
Oh, and for the record, moving files into .old/ directories is
evil for rsync. :) (This isn't directed at Pier) Moving files
around causes rsync to do a delete and then re-download the
moved files/directories.
-aaron
On Tuesday, November 26, 2002, at 08:07 AM, Aaron Bannert wrote:
What's in t
At 10:13 AM 11/26/2002, Joshua Slive wrote:
>On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
>
>> Folks, given that httpd is "mirrored worldwide" and not all mirrors are
>> actually rsyincing the ".old" directory (or anything that starts with a .
>> for what that matters), can you change the link in "
At 10:14 AM 11/26/2002, Aaron Bannert wrote:
>Oh, and for the record, moving files into .old/ directories is
>evil for rsync. :) (This isn't directed at Pier) Moving files
>around causes rsync to do a delete and then re-download the
>moved files/directories.
So you suggest initially populating old
> From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 26 November 2002 18:26
> At 10:14 AM 11/26/2002, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> >Oh, and for the record, moving files into .old/ directories is
> >evil for rsync. :) (This isn't directed at Pier) Moving files
> >around causes rsync to do a de
I already outlined a better solution on [EMAIL PROTECTED], and I
believe Justin just condensed all the ideas out there into one big
doc, so I'll defer to that. I think you have it right, but
I would say:
- put all the dist-able files into their final destination directories
- symlink to the curren
So you suggest initially populating old/ and then symlinking the
now-current version in the main download directory at the old/
target, instead? It would still initially download the package
twice, and then simply unlink it later on, right?
Or what's the right approach here?
I suggest moving th
> From: Roy T. Fielding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 26 November 2002 22:28
>> So you suggest initially populating old/ and then symlinking the
>> now-current version in the main download directory at the old/
>> target, instead? It would still initially download the package
>> twice, and t
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> Subject: Re: FW: Older version of apache2
>
> So you suggest initially populating old/ and then symlinking the
> now-current version in the main download directory at the old/
> target, instead? It would still initially download the
11 matches
Mail list logo