Jeff,
We tried LogLevel trace8. It indicates Response was sent with status 200.
But we are not sure whether the response packet was handed over to TCP/IP
statck properly. We are puzzled. We need to double check if something is
wrong with the network settings of our box itself.
Thanks,
Jitesh
On
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:09 AM, Jitesh Verma jitesh.ve...@gmail.com wrote:
Jeff,
We tried LogLevel trace8. It indicates Response was sent with status 200.
But we are not sure whether the response packet was handed over to TCP/IP
statck properly. We are puzzled. We need to double check if
Firewall is disabled. So, if packet is handed over to TCP/IP statck, it
won't get dropped.
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Jitesh Verma jitesh.ve...@gmail.comwrote:
Jeff,
We tried LogLevel trace8. It indicates Response was sent with status
200. But we are not sure whether the response
Jeff,
Are you aware of any Listen related configure setting?
Which files and functions handle socket bind() and socket write()/send()?
Thanks,
Jitesh
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:09 AM, Jitesh Verma jitesh.ve...@gmail.com
Althouh I see Response sent with status 200, headers ... in
error_log, I do not see matching write()/send() system call in strace
output. However, I do see Request received from client: GET / HTTP/1.1
... for incoming HTTP packet in both error_log and strace output.
Thanks,
Jitesh
On Thu,
Hi List,
We have ported httpd-2.4.2 to a network embedded box running Linux on
Xscale hardware. We have two modules of our own to handle XML requests from
our Applets. We have added all the 80 odd .so modules (that get built with
default configure settings) in httpd.conf.
We are able to access the
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:55 AM, Jitesh Verma jitesh.ve...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi List,
We have ported httpd-2.4.2 to a network embedded box running Linux on Xscale
hardware. We have two modules of our own to handle XML requests from our
Applets. We have added all the 80 odd .so modules (that get
On 10 Oct 2012, at 1:55 PM, Jitesh Verma jitesh.ve...@gmail.com wrote:
We have ported httpd-2.4.2 to a network embedded box running Linux on Xscale
hardware. We have two modules of our own to handle XML requests from our
Applets. We have added all the 80 odd .so modules (that get built with
Hi Graham,
Thanks for your reply.
Please see my reply in-line.
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 10 Oct 2012, at 1:55 PM, Jitesh Verma jitesh.ve...@gmail.com wrote:
We have ported httpd-2.4.2 to a network embedded box running Linux on
Xscale
Hi Jeff,
Thanks for your reply.
I had added only the first 8 modules in httpd.conf. Remaining modules were
added later only when I started facing this problem. Reducing the number of
modules back to 8 does not make any difference with respect to this issue.
With these 8 modules httpd worked fine
Hi Jitesh,
Am 10.10.2012 16:24, schrieb Jitesh Verma:
We are able to access the box's GUI/Applets with Listen 80
directive in
the httpd.conf.
However, when we add another directive Listen 9000 to
httpd.conf, httpd
does not respond to HTTP request sent to port 80.
11 matches
Mail list logo