Re: Help reqd. for httpd-2.4.2

2012-10-11 Thread Jitesh Verma
Jeff, We tried LogLevel trace8. It indicates Response was sent with status 200. But we are not sure whether the response packet was handed over to TCP/IP statck properly. We are puzzled. We need to double check if something is wrong with the network settings of our box itself. Thanks, Jitesh On

Re: Help reqd. for httpd-2.4.2

2012-10-11 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:09 AM, Jitesh Verma jitesh.ve...@gmail.com wrote: Jeff, We tried LogLevel trace8. It indicates Response was sent with status 200. But we are not sure whether the response packet was handed over to TCP/IP statck properly. We are puzzled. We need to double check if

Re: Help reqd. for httpd-2.4.2

2012-10-11 Thread Jitesh Verma
Firewall is disabled. So, if packet is handed over to TCP/IP statck, it won't get dropped. On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Jitesh Verma jitesh.ve...@gmail.comwrote: Jeff, We tried LogLevel trace8. It indicates Response was sent with status 200. But we are not sure whether the response

Re: Help reqd. for httpd-2.4.2

2012-10-11 Thread Jitesh Verma
Jeff, Are you aware of any Listen related configure setting? Which files and functions handle socket bind() and socket write()/send()? Thanks, Jitesh On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:09 AM, Jitesh Verma jitesh.ve...@gmail.com

Re: Help reqd. for httpd-2.4.2

2012-10-11 Thread Jitesh Verma
Althouh I see Response sent with status 200, headers ... in error_log, I do not see matching write()/send() system call in strace output. However, I do see Request received from client: GET / HTTP/1.1 ... for incoming HTTP packet in both error_log and strace output. Thanks, Jitesh On Thu,

Help reqd. for httpd-2.4.2

2012-10-10 Thread Jitesh Verma
Hi List, We have ported httpd-2.4.2 to a network embedded box running Linux on Xscale hardware. We have two modules of our own to handle XML requests from our Applets. We have added all the 80 odd .so modules (that get built with default configure settings) in httpd.conf. We are able to access the

Re: Help reqd. for httpd-2.4.2

2012-10-10 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:55 AM, Jitesh Verma jitesh.ve...@gmail.com wrote: Hi List, We have ported httpd-2.4.2 to a network embedded box running Linux on Xscale hardware. We have two modules of our own to handle XML requests from our Applets. We have added all the 80 odd .so modules (that get

Re: Help reqd. for httpd-2.4.2

2012-10-10 Thread Graham Leggett
On 10 Oct 2012, at 1:55 PM, Jitesh Verma jitesh.ve...@gmail.com wrote: We have ported httpd-2.4.2 to a network embedded box running Linux on Xscale hardware. We have two modules of our own to handle XML requests from our Applets. We have added all the 80 odd .so modules (that get built with

Re: Help reqd. for httpd-2.4.2

2012-10-10 Thread Jitesh Verma
Hi Graham, Thanks for your reply. Please see my reply in-line. On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote: On 10 Oct 2012, at 1:55 PM, Jitesh Verma jitesh.ve...@gmail.com wrote: We have ported httpd-2.4.2 to a network embedded box running Linux on Xscale

Re: Help reqd. for httpd-2.4.2

2012-10-10 Thread Jitesh Verma
Hi Jeff, Thanks for your reply. I had added only the first 8 modules in httpd.conf. Remaining modules were added later only when I started facing this problem. Reducing the number of modules back to 8 does not make any difference with respect to this issue. With these 8 modules httpd worked fine

Re: Help reqd. for httpd-2.4.2

2012-10-10 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi Jitesh, Am 10.10.2012 16:24, schrieb Jitesh Verma: We are able to access the box's GUI/Applets with Listen 80 directive in the httpd.conf. However, when we add another directive Listen 9000 to httpd.conf, httpd does not respond to HTTP request sent to port 80.