William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Wondering if this is worth a great deal of time until we define the VFS
in less APR'ish, less filesystem'ish patterns.
Maybe an APR-like file-system interface is an appropriate interface for
a virtual filesystem? I guess it is a question of how much you want to
Hi.
For my module mod_i18n I would need an interface to content negotiation.
I want to say Dear mod_negotiation, I offer the following language
variants (for the current request). Which one do you choose?. By now
the only way to do this is to put variant files or a type map in the
file system and
Joachim Zobel wrote:
For my module mod_i18n I would need an interface to content negotiation.
I want to say Dear mod_negotiation, I offer the following language
variants (for the current request). Which one do you choose?. By now
the only way to do this is to put variant files or a type map in
Am Mittwoch, den 02.01.2008, 11:52 -0600 schrieb William A. Rowe, Jr.:
Joachim Zobel wrote:
I want to say Dear mod_negotiation, I offer the following language
variants (for the current request). Which one do you choose?.
Wondering if this is worth a great deal of time until we define the
On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 21:42:43 +0100
Joachim Zobel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is probably some grand unified approach ahead, with filter
layers between VFSes that besides the usual filter stuff do URL
rewriting. Such an approach needs to be very well specified to keep
it simple enough to be
Am Mittwoch, den 02.01.2008, 20:52 + schrieb Nick Kew:
On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 21:42:43 +0100
Joachim Zobel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is probably some grand unified approach ahead, with filter
layers between VFSes that besides the usual filter stuff do URL
rewriting. Such an
