Re: Question about httpd / APR version relationship

2007-05-10 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Guenter Knauf wrote: > Hi, >> On 5/9/07, Guenter Knauf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Apache 2.0.x -> has to use APR 0.9.x >>> Apache 2.2.x -> has to use APR 1.2.x >>> Apache 2.3.x -> has to use APR 1.3.x >>> >>> is this now a mandatory relationship, or is it valid to: >>> >>> build Apache 2.2.x wi

Re: Question about httpd / APR version relationship

2007-05-10 Thread Ian Holsman
Guenter Knauf wrote: Hi, On 5/9/07, Guenter Knauf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Apache 2.0.x -> has to use APR 0.9.x Apache 2.2.x -> has to use APR 1.2.x Apache 2.3.x -> has to use APR 1.3.x is this now a mandatory relationship, or is it valid to: build Apache 2.2.x with APR 1.3.x

Re: Question about httpd / APR version relationship

2007-05-10 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi, > On 5/9/07, Guenter Knauf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Apache 2.0.x -> has to use APR 0.9.x >> Apache 2.2.x -> has to use APR 1.2.x >> Apache 2.3.x -> has to use APR 1.3.x >> >> is this now a mandatory relationship, or is it valid to: >> >> build Apache 2.2.x with APR 1.3.x > This would like

Re: Question about httpd / APR version relationship

2007-05-10 Thread Garrett Rooney
On 5/9/07, Guenter Knauf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all, currently from what I see we use: Apache 2.0.x -> has to use APR 0.9.x Apache 2.2.x -> has to use APR 1.2.x Apache 2.3.x -> has to use APR 1.3.x is this now a mandatory relationship, or is it valid to: build Apache 2.2.x with APR 1.3.

Question about httpd / APR version relationship

2007-05-09 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi all, currently from what I see we use: Apache 2.0.x -> has to use APR 0.9.x Apache 2.2.x -> has to use APR 1.2.x Apache 2.3.x -> has to use APR 1.3.x is this now a mandatory relationship, or is it valid to: build Apache 2.2.x with APR 1.3.x build Apache 2.3.x with APR 1.2.x I assume on Linux