Guenter Knauf wrote:
> Hi,
>> On 5/9/07, Guenter Knauf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Apache 2.0.x -> has to use APR 0.9.x
>>> Apache 2.2.x -> has to use APR 1.2.x
>>> Apache 2.3.x -> has to use APR 1.3.x
>>>
>>> is this now a mandatory relationship, or is it valid to:
>>>
>>> build Apache 2.2.x wi
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
On 5/9/07, Guenter Knauf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Apache 2.0.x -> has to use APR 0.9.x
Apache 2.2.x -> has to use APR 1.2.x
Apache 2.3.x -> has to use APR 1.3.x
is this now a mandatory relationship, or is it valid to:
build Apache 2.2.x with APR 1.3.x
Hi,
> On 5/9/07, Guenter Knauf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Apache 2.0.x -> has to use APR 0.9.x
>> Apache 2.2.x -> has to use APR 1.2.x
>> Apache 2.3.x -> has to use APR 1.3.x
>>
>> is this now a mandatory relationship, or is it valid to:
>>
>> build Apache 2.2.x with APR 1.3.x
> This would like
On 5/9/07, Guenter Knauf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
currently from what I see we use:
Apache 2.0.x -> has to use APR 0.9.x
Apache 2.2.x -> has to use APR 1.2.x
Apache 2.3.x -> has to use APR 1.3.x
is this now a mandatory relationship, or is it valid to:
build Apache 2.2.x with APR 1.3.
Hi all,
currently from what I see we use:
Apache 2.0.x -> has to use APR 0.9.x
Apache 2.2.x -> has to use APR 1.2.x
Apache 2.3.x -> has to use APR 1.3.x
is this now a mandatory relationship, or is it valid to:
build Apache 2.2.x with APR 1.3.x
build Apache 2.3.x with APR 1.2.x
I assume on Linux