Aaron Bannert wrote:
Having some problems with the images, I think the spaces are freaking
out my Linux/Netscape browser.
Indeed. Embedded spaces are illegal; the page that links to
the images needs to use encoding like 'Transport%20Error%20Analysis.gif'.
Curiously enough, '%20' encoding
The transaction stats were what jumped out at me - 7% increase in failed
connections doesn't sound good to me :( But, then maybe I'm reading that
wrong?
david
Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ian, could you please explain in words what these results mean?
okay, maybe I won't feel
From: David Reid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 December 2001 13:57
The transaction stats were what jumped out at me - 7% increase in failed
connections doesn't sound good to me :( But, then maybe I'm reading that
wrong?
Which is what I saw first too. But when I talked to Ian over
succesful number of completions to be a bad
thing, not a good thing??
david
- Original Message -
From: Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 1:02 PM
Subject: RE: Benchmark: 29 vs 30
From: David Reid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 02:15:37PM -0800, Ian Holsman wrote:
I finally got our load-generating machine to work properly.
Here are some benchmarks comparing v29 with v30 of apache
http://webperf.org/a2/caw/29/caw.html
http://webperf.org/a2/caw/30/caw.html
Having some problems with the
On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 02:02:53PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote:
From: David Reid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 December 2001 13:57
The transaction stats were what jumped out at me - 7% increase in failed
connections doesn't sound good to me :( But, then maybe I'm reading that
Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 02:02:53PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote:
From: David Reid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 December 2001 13:57
The transaction stats were what jumped out at me - 7% increase in failed
connections doesn't sound good to me :( But, then maybe I'm
