RE: E-Kabong resolution: Re: acceptance of El-Kabong into APR

2002-09-12 Thread Leonardo Javier Belén
Hi all there, I was reading all the stuff related to the E-K parser and may be I have something to say. I've been using Apache for quite a long time, developing my own modules mostly, and althought I think the quality of the program is superb (I have to choose a http server to work with I

RE: E-Kabong resolution: Re: acceptance of El-Kabong into APR

2002-09-12 Thread Scott Hess
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Harrie Hazewinkel wrote: > --On Thursday, September 12, 2002 8:50 AM -0500 "Jenkins, David" > > I disagree almost completely. If you are truly dedicated to the ASF > > community, you will understand the cautiousness necessary in deciding > > who has commit privs. > > I was

RE: E-Kabong resolution: Re: acceptance of El-Kabong into APR

2002-09-12 Thread Harrie Hazewinkel
Hi, --On Thursday, September 12, 2002 8:50 AM -0500 "Jenkins, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> --On Wednesday, September 11, 2002 1:55 PM -0700 Jon Travis >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 07:45:21PM +, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > I disagree almost completely. I

Re: E-Kabong resolution: Re: acceptance of El-Kabong into APR

2002-09-12 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 08:50:40AM -0500, Jenkins, David wrote: [snip] > my 2.5 cents > David J > > Sorry to post out of the blue on this but the last few messages really > struck a chord. No reason to apologize, all comments are welcome. -aaron

RE: E-Kabong resolution: Re: acceptance of El-Kabong into APR

2002-09-12 Thread Jenkins, David
> --On Wednesday, September 11, 2002 1:55 PM -0700 Jon Travis > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 07:45:21PM +, Jeff Trawick wrote: >>> While we believe that the El-Kabong codebase is a valuable contribution >>> that we would like to pick up, we also recognize the possib

Re: E-Kabong resolution: Re: acceptance of El-Kabong into APR

2002-09-12 Thread Harrie Hazewinkel
Hi, Comment inline on 2 emails. --On Wednesday, September 11, 2002 1:55 PM -0700 Jon Travis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 07:45:21PM +, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> While we believe that the El-Kabong codebase is a valuable contribution >> that we would like to pick up, we

Re: E-Kabong resolution: Re: acceptance of El-Kabong into APR

2002-09-11 Thread Greg Stein
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 09:52:56PM -0400, John K. Sterling wrote: >... > to Rasmus' point - maybe the group should have just said 'no' instead > of trying to justify it (and not QUITE to greg's point, IMHO all > emails from the apache group that declare a decision should be to a > public list)

Re: E-Kabong resolution: Re: acceptance of El-Kabong into APR

2002-09-11 Thread John K . Sterling
On Wednesday, September 11, 2002, at 04:55 PM, Jon Travis wrote: > Jeff, > > I cc'd the dev@ lists, since the original proposition was made there, > and the public following the discussion should know the resolution. > > My comments at the end. to Rasmus' point - maybe the group should have jus

Re: E-Kabong resolution: Re: acceptance of El-Kabong into APR

2002-09-11 Thread Jon Travis
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 04:25:00PM -0700, Greg Stein wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 01:55:35PM -0700, Jon Travis wrote: > > I've decided to host the project elsewhere. It would be extremely > > frustrating to require you, the ASF, to review code I'm patching > > to code I initially wrote, giv

Re: E-Kabong resolution: Re: acceptance of El-Kabong into APR

2002-09-11 Thread Greg Stein
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 01:55:35PM -0700, Jon Travis wrote: > Jeff, > > I cc'd the dev@ lists, since the original proposition was made there, > and the public following the discussion should know the resolution. Jon, Most people would consider it improper to forward personal email to a public f

Re: E-Kabong resolution: Re: acceptance of El-Kabong into APR

2002-09-11 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
> > While we believe that the El-Kabong codebase is a valuable contribution > > that we would like to pick up, we also recognize the possibility that > > you may have a decreased incentive to work on it further if you are > > initially denied commit access to the repository when it moves to the >