HEAD on httpd-2.2 passes the perl framework tests and looks good.
Planning on tagging/rolling later on today assuming nothing pops up,
so please test beforehand :)
-Original Message-
From: Jim Jagielski
Sent: Montag, 20. Juli 2009 13:29
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Intent to TR 2.2.12
HEAD on httpd-2.2 passes the perl framework tests and looks good.
Planning on tagging/rolling later on today assuming nothing pops up,
so please
On Jul 20, 2009, at 7:47 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jim Jagielski
Sent: Montag, 20. Juli 2009 13:29
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Intent to TR 2.2.12
HEAD on httpd-2.2 passes the perl framework tests and looks good.
Planning on tagging
all,
Jim Jagielski schrieb:
HEAD on httpd-2.2 passes the perl framework tests and looks good.
Planning on tagging/rolling later on today assuming nothing pops up,
so please test beforehand :)
would be really great if I could get some votes on the gen_test_char
change - it doesnt alter code for
Guenter Knauf wrote:
would be really great if I could get some votes on the gen_test_char
change - it doesnt alter code for any other platform, but only makes it
possible to decouple gen_test_char from APR with a define so I'm able to
build a native version of it when cross-compiling:
On Jul 20, 2009, at 12:56 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
Guenter Knauf wrote:
would be really great if I could get some votes on the gen_test_char
change - it doesnt alter code for any other platform, but only
makes it
possible to decouple gen_test_char from APR with a define so I'm
able to
Hi Graham,
Graham Leggett schrieb:
Guenter Knauf wrote:
would be really great if I could get some votes on the gen_test_char
change - it doesnt alter code for any other platform, but only makes it
possible to decouple gen_test_char from APR with a define so I'm able to
build a native
Hi,
Graham Leggett schrieb:
I see there is a WANT_WIN32_OS2 symbol as well which seems unrelated to
the CROSS_COMPILE symbol, can you confirm whether you need both?
probably the name was not good - I was also thinking of something like
NEED_ENHANCED_ESCAPES or so ...; if someone has a better
On Jul 20, 2009, at 1:48 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
Graham Leggett schrieb:
I see there is a WANT_WIN32_OS2 symbol as well which seems
unrelated to
the CROSS_COMPILE symbol, can you confirm whether you need both?
probably the name was not good - I was also thinking of something like
On Jul 20, 2009, at 1:23 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi Graham,
Graham Leggett schrieb:
Guenter Knauf wrote:
would be really great if I could get some votes on the gen_test_char
change - it doesnt alter code for any other platform, but only
makes it
possible to decouple gen_test_char from
Jim Jagielski wrote:
However, instead of waiting for a full APR release, it would be
nice to maybe tag an interim version of APR and bundle *that* with
2.2.12...
No, it would not, httpd will not become responsible for APR's releases
unless the APR project is folded and httpd project votes to
Nick Kew wrote on 2009-07-19 00:04:59:
Just been reviewing it with the testcase Bob found. I'm not able to
reproduce the problem on this platform because Sun CC sets the
non-matches to 0, so it all works. But the problem is clear.
This throws up a non-serious problem with the patch:
Nick Kew wrote:
Patching trunk based on the above. Will propose for backport
if noone disputes my amendment to the patch.
Done in r795445.
--
Nick Kew
Lars Eilebrecht wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Over the weekend I'll be doing some final things with the intent
to tag and roll 2.2.12 on Monday...
I just realized that I still have one patch for 2.2.12 which fixes an
SSI-related bug causing a segfault when handling regex back-references
(see
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Over the weekend I'll be doing some final things with the intent
to tag and roll 2.2.12 on Monday...
I just realized that I still have one patch for 2.2.12 which fixes an
SSI-related bug causing a segfault when handling regex back-references
(see attachment).
I didn't
-Original Message-
From: Lars Eilebrecht
Sent: Freitag, 17. Juli 2009 15:49
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Intent to TR 2.2.12
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Over the weekend I'll be doing some final things with the intent
to tag and roll 2.2.12 on Monday...
I just realized
Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
If you have time (fix in trunk, backport proposal) I will have a look
at the proposal and vote on it to get it in.
+1. Segfault sounds serious enough to prioritise!
--
Nick Kew
On Jul 17, 2009, at 9:49 AM, Lars Eilebrecht wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Over the weekend I'll be doing some final things with the intent
to tag and roll 2.2.12 on Monday...
I just realized that I still have one patch for 2.2.12 which fixes an
SSI-related bug causing a segfault when
2009/7/17 Nick Kew n...@webthing.com:
I've a faint recollection of someone raising this issue,
but a quick google didn't find it. Do you have a test-case
that provokes the bug you're fixing?
http://markmail.org/message/jlc7t5edsjujbe37 ;-)
Bob
19 matches
Mail list logo
