"William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Maybe [to keep Jeff happy] we further parse
>
> Listen *:80
> Listen [*]:80
>
> to bind to only IPv4 and IPv6 respectively (or something like that???)
We already have the ability to do
Listen 0.0.0.0:80
Listen [::]:80
so in effect we alrea
"Joshua Slive" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeff Trawick
> >
> > 3) I don't like the idea that one Listen statement means more than one
> >listening socket
>
> I don't understand what you mean by that. Listen * has always
From: "Joshua Slive" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 9:12 AM
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeff Trawick
> >
> > 3) I don't like the idea that one Listen statement means more than one
> >listening socket
>
> I don't understand what
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeff Trawick
>
> 3) I don't like the idea that one Listen statement means more than one
>listening socket
I don't understand what you mean by that. Listen * has always been a
special case that listens to ALL available addres
Curt Sampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is anybody out there working on a resolution of PR 7492? The bug
> is basically that, when you use "Listen *", it listens only on IPv6
> interfaces, and never opens any of the IPv4 interfaces in the system.
> (This may actually work to listen on IPv4 int
