Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]:11 GMT-5
I agree the documentation should be better. Also we should properly
document
the perchild-like options, since that is frequently-requested. In the
meantime, here's a list of things to look at if you want
perchild-like:
* Metux MPM
*
On Thursday 10 February 2005 14:10, Leif W wrote:
Hi, sorry if this is off-topic, but I just want to make sure I
understand this problem. Last month I read an email on another list
(suPHP) in which someone was upset about the security of Apache 2.0.x
with all file i/o and cgi being done by a
From: Leif W [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 3:10 PM
[...]
It's already a huge list of workaround and compatibility and portability for
an admin could be a nightmare. I do not know if there are even more security
wrappers needed for other language modules. Can
At 08:10 AM 2/10/2005, Leif W wrote:
I'm just trying to understand where the breakdown is. A feature that people
want, the lack of which spawns a sloppy slew of incompatible workarounds, but
no one around to respond and code it or fix what's available. The strength of
Apache was always *nix,
Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]:15 GMT-5
On Thursday 10 February 2005 14:10, Leif W wrote:
Hi, sorry if this is off-topic, but I just want to make sure I
understand this problem. Last month I read an email on another list
(suPHP) in which someone was upset about the security of
Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]:35 GMT-5
From: Leif W [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 3:10 PM
things which might commonly be used in concert? Is there any
direction given
from the top of the Apache group in regards to what gets attention?
No, there
Leif W wrote:
My only concern is, if some people solved the puzzle externally, then
are there barriers which prevent them from getting the code committed?
The Metux web pages (official and unofficial) seem to be works in
progress. There is a quote which indicates that at least the guy
