thanks for the response, much appreciated.
yeah, for the +s stuff i've just run 'chatr +s enable' over the entire
build output (well the bin & lib hieararchy anyway). it's cheap and fast ;)
cheers,
andy
Jeff Trawick wrote:
> Andy Cutright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>hi,
>>
>>so could
Andy Cutright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hi,
>
> so could you possibly speak those unspeakable hacks you've made to
> apache to run c++ modules on hp? we're trying to get a c++ module
> linked into 2.0.39. any help would be appreciated. we can take this
> particular aspect of the discussion o
"William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Doesn't an option --c-plus-plus make more sense than a platform
> specific link foo option? Shouldn't we just extend libtool to deal with
> the platform specifics, g++ or whatnot, depending on what's required
> to support stl and other specifi
ubject: Re: compatibility with C++ modules
>
>
>
> On Friday, September 6, 2002, at 04:53 PM, Andy Cutright wrote:
>
> > hi,
> >
> > so could you possibly speak those unspeakable hacks you've made to
> > apache to run c++ modules on hp? we
On Friday, September 6, 2002, at 04:53 PM, Andy Cutright wrote:
> hi,
>
> so could you possibly speak those unspeakable hacks you've made to
> apache to run c++ modules on hp? we're trying to get a c++ module
> linked into 2.0.39. any help would be appreciated. we can take this
> particular a
At 11:27 AM 9/6/2002, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>Aaron Bannert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 11:55:17AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > > Though we probably don't want to be in the business of pretending to
> > > support C++ modules in general, they certainly work with Apache
hi,
so could you possibly speak those unspeakable hacks you've made to
apache to run c++ modules on hp? we're trying to get a c++ module linked
into 2.0.39. any help would be appreciated. we can take this particular
aspect of the discussion out of this forum, if you'd prefer,
cheers
andy
Jef
Aaron Bannert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 11:55:17AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > Though we probably don't want to be in the business of pretending to
> > support C++ modules in general, they certainly work with Apache on
> > some platforms and we could at least make i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> So I haven't really looked into how it works, but have you looked at
> mod_cplusplus?
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/modcplusplus/
just took a look, seems neat
--
Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 11:55:17AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> Though we probably don't want to be in the business of pretending to
> support C++ modules in general, they certainly work with Apache on
> some platforms and we could at least make it simple for the user to
> specify the command to i
So I haven't really looked into how it works, but have you looked at
mod_cplusplus?
http://sourceforge.net/projects/modcplusplus/
Ryan
On 6 Sep 2002, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> At about the same time recently that I was doing horrible,
> uncommittable hacks to the build to get Apache 2.0 to suppor
11 matches
Mail list logo
