On 4/19/06, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think that the Proxy FastCGI module is at a point where
we should consider folding it into trunk, with the hope
of it being backported to 2.2.x and some not-too-distant
future.
Since everyone seems to be in favor of merging it I went ahead
On 4/19/06, Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 April 2006 16:06, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> > > +1 on merging to trunk, +0 on 2.2.x. I'd love to see someone actually
> > > using it for something real before it goes into any release, and at
> > > this point I'm not sure it has...
>
On 4/19/06, Colm MacCarthaigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 11:06:56AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > > +1 on merging to trunk, +0 on 2.2.x. I'd love to see someone actually
> > > using it for something real before it goes into any release, and at
> > > this point I'm not s
Nick Kew wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 19 April 2006 16:06, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> > > +1 on merging to trunk, +0 on 2.2.x. I'd love to see someone actually
> > > using it for something real before it goes into any release, and at
> > > this point I'm not sure it has...
> >
> > Hence my desire to ge
On Wednesday 19 April 2006 16:06, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > +1 on merging to trunk, +0 on 2.2.x. I'd love to see someone actually
> > using it for something real before it goes into any release, and at
> > this point I'm not sure it has...
>
> Hence my desire to get it into a branch that people ar
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 11:06:56AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > +1 on merging to trunk, +0 on 2.2.x. I'd love to see someone actually
> > using it for something real before it goes into any release, and at
> > this point I'm not sure it has...
>
> Hence my desire to get it into a branch that p
Garrett Rooney wrote:
>
> On 4/19/06, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think that the Proxy FastCGI module is at a point where
> > we should consider folding it into trunk, with the hope
> > of it being backported to 2.2.x and some not-too-distant
> > future.
> >
> > Comments?
>
> +
On 4/19/06, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF EITO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> > Von: Jim Jagielski
> >
> >
> > I think that the Proxy FastCGI module is at a point where
> > we should consider folding it into trunk, with the hope
> > of it being backported to 2.2.x and so
On 4/19/06, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that the Proxy FastCGI module is at a point where
> we should consider folding it into trunk, with the hope
> of it being backported to 2.2.x and some not-too-distant
> future.
>
> Comments?
+1 on merging to trunk, +0 on 2.2.x. I'd lo
