"William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote:
> 9353 mod_proxy proxy redirect URL are not properly created
> 9652 mod_proxy mod_proxy fails when using as a reverse proxy
The above are duplicates - and I cannot reproduce them.
> 10010 mod_proxy mod_proxy fails second HTTP/1.1 reverse proxy request to an
> 1.1 s
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 03:09:21PM -0500, MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
wrote:
> Yep. i think it's fixed.. Here's a output from one of the configure command
> that I'd run some time back. I'll try it out again and let you know the
> results.
>
> checking size of long long... 8
> check
size of ssize_t... 4
-Madhu
-Original Message-
From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 11:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Open Apache 2.0 Bug Summary
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 01:57:45AM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> 8932 config Co
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 01:57:45AM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> 9361 build expat, manualdir and Makefile fixes
Confirmed that all of these patches have already been incorporated
in some fashion. PR closed. -- justin
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 01:57:45AM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> 8932 config Configure claims that the header file "stdint.h" exists because
> STD64_C is def
Should be fixed by revision 1.421 of apr's configure.in. Can
someone with HP-UX's ANSI C compiler verify this? -- justin
: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 10:51 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Open Apache 2.0 Bug Summary
>
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 01:57:45AM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > 8845 os-sunos Apache 2.0.28 beta does not compile under Solaris 8
(both
> > Intel and Sparc)
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 01:57:45AM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> 8845 os-sunos Apache 2.0.28 beta does not compile under Solaris 8 (both
> Intel and Sparc) using perchild MPM
We should indicate that perchild is experimental. However, I won't
close this bug or append a note though. I'll
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 01:57:45AM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> 7730 config magic file is a bit outdated
Just committed the relevant bits to both 1.3 and 2.0 trees for this
and closed the PR.
Working my way through the rest of them... -- justin
Cliff Woolley wrote:
>On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Greg Ames wrote:
>
>>>9676 mod_cgi 2.0.18 reading from CGI programs is very inefficient
>>>
>>BrianP committed a fix for this very recently.
>>
>
>I thought only mod_cgi was fixed but mod_cgid was still outstanding?
>
Right, mod_cgid still does single-b
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Greg Ames wrote:
> > 9676 mod_cgi 2.0.18 reading from CGI programs is very inefficient
>
> BrianP committed a fix for this very recently.
I thought only mod_cgi was fixed but mod_cgid was still outstanding?
--Cliff
--
"William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote:
> 9676 mod_cgi 2.0.18 reading from CGI programs is very inefficient
BrianP committed a fix for this very recently.
Greg
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 06:55:35AM -0800, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 09:47:24AM +, Thom May wrote:
> > 9827 and 9886 are definitely fixed.
>
> Yup, I [mostly] fixed those, I'll close them now. thanks,
(it must be too early to be writing to dev@httpd). Of course I don't
me
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 09:47:24AM +, Thom May wrote:
> 9827 and 9886 are definitely fixed.
Yup, I [mostly] fixed those, I'll close them now. thanks,
aaron
9827 and 9886 are definitely fixed.
-Thom
14 matches
Mail list logo
