Re: lb_score

2006-02-14 Thread Nick Kew
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 15:06, Jim Jagielski wrote: Off the top of my head, I have no idea why we even have lb_score Neither have I. Someone slipped it it; noone objected. rather than just using proxy_worker_stat as we should. This is easy to fix except for the fact that

Re: lb_score

2006-02-14 Thread Jim Jagielski
Nick Kew wrote: I haven't thought this through yet, but presumably we could implement an API for this. Something like: struct worker_score { /* all the stuff that's there now */ void data[]; /* at the end */ }; /* ditto other records */ :) I did this awhile ago on all the

Re: lb_score

2006-02-14 Thread Bill Stoddard
Jim Jagielski wrote: Nick Kew wrote: I haven't thought this through yet, but presumably we could implement an API for this. Something like: struct worker_score { /* all the stuff that's there now */ void data[]; /* at the end */ }; /* ditto other records */ :) I did this awhile