On Feb 3, 2012, at 4:25 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
mod_slotmem cannot work on windows by design.
On windows we have two processes so the storage-grab/slotmem_grab
will always fail because the inuse flag was already set in the parent,
and since this is shared memory child will see it as
Under Win32, do the 2 processes know which is which?
On Feb 3, 2012, at 5:46 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 3, 2012, at 4:25 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
mod_slotmem cannot work on windows by design.
On windows we have two processes so the storage-grab/slotmem_grab
will always fail
On 02/03/2012 11:46 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 3, 2012, at 4:25 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
mod_slotmem cannot work on windows by design.
On windows we have two processes so the storage-grab/slotmem_grab
will always fail because the inuse flag was already set in the parent,
and since
On Feb 3, 2012, at 8:03 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Right, seems that's not the reason for PR52402.
Found the fix for it. The reason is the loop:
while (s) {
int i,j;
proxy_balancer *balancer;
sconf = s-module_config;
conf = (proxy_server_conf
On 02/03/2012 02:45 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 3, 2012, at 8:03 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Right, seems that's not the reason for PR52402.
Found the fix for it. The reason is the loop:
while (s) {
int i,j;
proxy_balancer *balancer;
sconf = s-module_config;
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 03:06:03PM +0100, Mladen Turk wrote:
Well actually I think that there could be multiple server_rec
for which ap_get_module_config(s-module_config,proxy_module) will
return the same proxy_server_conf.
My patch will handle those cases (the PR52402 itself)
Think I'll
On 2/3/2012 4:46 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 3, 2012, at 4:25 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
mod_slotmem cannot work on windows by design.
On windows we have two processes so the storage-grab/slotmem_grab
will always fail because the inuse flag was already set in the parent,
and since
onsdag 30 augusti 2006 10:37 skrev Brian Akins:
With all the talk of a generic scoreboard, here's something I whipped
up that allows any other module to have some amount of memory per
worker slot. We have a different module in-house at CNN which does
something similar. This one is a little
Oden Eriksson wrote:
onsdag 30 augusti 2006 10:37 skrev Brian Akins:
With all the talk of a generic scoreboard, here's something I whipped
up that allows any other module to have some amount of memory per
worker slot. We have a different module in-house at CNN which does
something similar.
On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 10:37 -0400, Brian Akins wrote:
With all the talk of a generic scoreboard, here's something I whipped
up that allows any other module to have some amount of memory per
worker slot. We have a different module in-house at CNN which does
something similar. This one is a
Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
Nice stuff but I am not sure that having shared memory per slot scales
when having a lot of entries, but that makes sure that one
process/thread won't overwrite another one slot.
It scales very nicely. We run with max clients set between 16k-32k with
no issues.
Brian Akins wrote:
Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
Nice stuff but I am not sure that having shared memory per slot scales
when having a lot of entries, but that makes sure that one
process/thread won't overwrite another one slot.
It scales very nicely. We run with max clients set between
12 matches
Mail list logo
