Re: porstfs bug t2000 and 2.2

2006-08-30 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 09:20:52AM -0400, Brian Akins wrote: We tested a Sun t2000 with httpd 2.2. It did okay. Now, Sun says there is an issue with 2.2 and portfs on Solaris 10 on the t2000. It didn't do very well for me with Solaris 10 either. Not real sure what this means. Anyone else

Re: porstfs bug t2000 and 2.2

2006-08-30 Thread Rainer Jung
Look at Sun Alert 102485: http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-26-102485-1 The bug should have been fixed with 118833-12 several months ago. Most early evaluaters of Niagara with Apache 2.2 ran into kernel panics because of the bug. The most recent kernel update patch is

Re: porstfs bug t2000 and 2.2

2006-08-30 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On 8/30/06, Rainer Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The most recent kernel update patch is 118833-20 (SPARC versions, X86 should be analogous). Yah, that bug has been fixed. (Paul reported the bug early on, I think.) We have also heard reports that the SSL crypto engine on the T2000's is

Re: porstfs bug t2000 and 2.2

2006-08-30 Thread Shanti Subramanyam
Yes - there are issues with Apache on Solaris 10 when using SSL (nothing to do with the T2000). We currently have two bugs outstanding : http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6375348 http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6374503 In our testing,