On 2015-06-16 13:39, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 7:24 PM, olli hauer wrote:
>>
>> As a side note, even I've read the Release Notes I was thankful to see my
>> console was trashed with the deprecation warning ;)
>>
>> What I miss is a section on httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/ with a l
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 7:24 PM, olli hauer wrote:
>
> As a side note, even I've read the Release Notes I was thankful to see my
> console was trashed with the deprecation warning ;)
>
> What I miss is a section on httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/ with a link list what
> has changed since which releas
On 15 June 2015 14:12:27 UTC+01:00, Eric Covener wrote:
>Anyone else inclined to just remove the message? It's a deprecation
>that didn't happen on a release boundary. AFAICT there's no reason to change
>how you run your server unless you use two different cert chains and then
>you'd find the info
On 2015-06-15 03:36, Gregg Smith wrote:
> On 6/14/2015 6:14 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
>> On 6/14/2015 2:56 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~gsmith/proposal/sslcertificatechainfile_compromise.diff
>>> I'm fine with this appro
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 10:54 AM, William A Rowe Jr
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 8:12 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
>>
>>> Anyone else inclined to just remove the message? It's a deprecation that
>>> didn't happen on a release boundary.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 10:54 AM, William A Rowe Jr
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 8:12 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
>
>> Anyone else inclined to just remove the message? It's a deprecation that
>> didn't happen on a release boundary. AFAICT there's no reason to change how
>> you run your server un
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 8:12 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
> Anyone else inclined to just remove the message? It's a deprecation that
> didn't happen on a release boundary. AFAICT there's no reason to change how
> you run your server unless you use two different cert chains and then you'd
> find the in
> On Jun 15, 2015, at 9:12 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
>
> Anyone else inclined to just remove the message?
I'm +1 for that.
Anyone else inclined to just remove the message? It's a deprecation that
didn't happen on a release boundary. AFAICT there's no reason to change how
you run your server unless you use two different cert chains and then you'd
find the info in the manual.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 8:57 AM Jim Jagielsk
Well, we have time now to Do This Right in 2.4.15, so
> On Jun 14, 2015, at 9:43 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
>
> On 15/06/2015 07:56, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~gsmith/proposal/sslcertificatechainfile_compromise
On 15/06/2015 07:56, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
>
>> http://people.apache.org/~gsmith/proposal/sslcertificatechainfile_compromise.diff
>> [1]
>
> I'm fine with this approach too.
> We have to decide whether a single [warn] is acceptable or not
On 6/14/2015 6:14 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 6/14/2015 2:56 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~gsmith/proposal/sslcertificatechainfile_compromise.diff
I'm fine with this approach too.
We have to decide whether a single [warn] i
On 6/14/2015 2:56 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~gsmith/proposal/sslcertificatechainfile_compromise.diff
I'm fine with this approach too.
We have to decide whether a single [warn] is acceptable or not since
it may still conf
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~gsmith/proposal/sslcertificatechainfile_compromise.diff
I'm fine with this approach too.
We have to decide whether a single [warn] is acceptable or not since
it may still confuse startup monitors, which was a point
On 6/14/2015 2:54 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 11:29 AM, wrote:
Author: gsmith
Date: Sun Jun 14 09:29:50 2015
New Revision: 1685371
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1685371
Log:
-1 vote w/ comment
Modified:
httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 11:29 AM, wrote:
> Author: gsmith
> Date: Sun Jun 14 09:29:50 2015
> New Revision: 1685371
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1685371
> Log:
> -1 vote w/ comment
>
> Modified:
> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
>
> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
> URL:
> ht
16 matches
Mail list logo
