Re: SSLProxy* in section

2017-10-23 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote: > >> Am 23.10.2017 um 16:25 schrieb Yann Ylavic : >> >> Hi Stefan, >> >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Stefan Eissing >> wrote: >>> >>> Can you give me a sign if this will arrive soonish or need to be stashed? >>> Thanks! >> >> I've just

Re: SSLProxy* in section

2017-10-23 Thread Stefan Eissing
> Am 23.10.2017 um 16:25 schrieb Yann Ylavic : > > Hi Stefan, > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Stefan Eissing > wrote: >> >> Can you give me a sign if this will arrive soonish or need to be stashed? >> Thanks! > > I've just updated the backport proposal with the change (r1812193) > inte

Re: SSLProxy* in section

2017-10-23 Thread Yann Ylavic
Hi Stefan, On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Stefan Eissing wrote: > > Can you give me a sign if this will arrive soonish or need to be stashed? > Thanks! I've just updated the backport proposal with the change (r1812193) intended to address compatibility issues raised by Bill (MMN major bump).

SSLProxy* in section

2017-10-23 Thread Stefan Eissing
Guys, what is the status of the 2.4.x backport? *) mod_proxy, mod_ssl: Handle SSLProxy* directives in sections, I'd like to propose several mod_ssl backports to then propose a mod_md backport, but the missing proxy changes makes the merge rather non-automatic, it seems. I can do a patch witho