Tagged the tree, one more time

2003-01-14 Thread Sander Striker
Hi, I just tagged STRIKER_2_0_44_PRE3. I think this is going to be our .44. It would be nice to give it one more day on daedalus and get some +1s on it. Thanks, Sander Differences since PRE2 tag: === httpd-2.0 [x] CHANGES [x] STATUS [x] Makefile.win wrowe Adapt to Brane's apr-iconv

Re: Tagged the tree, one more time

2003-01-14 Thread Roy T. Fielding
Private tags are getting pretty annoying. You should only use one and only one private tag per RM (without a version number) and just move it around to reflect the state of your private tree. On a related note, I would like to remove all of the non-official tags that are older than a few months.

Re: Tagged the tree, one more time

2003-01-14 Thread Greg Stein
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 02:55:14PM -0800, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > Private tags are getting pretty annoying. You should only use one > and only one private tag per RM (without a version number) and just > move it around to reflect the state of your private tree. > > On a related note, I would lik

RE: Tagged the tree, one more time

2003-01-15 Thread Sander Striker
> From: Roy T. Fielding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 11:55 PM > Private tags are getting pretty annoying. You should only use one > and only one private tag per RM (without a version number) and just > move it around to reflect the state of your private tree. Actu

Re: Tagged the tree, one more time

2003-01-15 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 04:55 PM 1/14/2003, Roy T. Fielding wrote: >Private tags are getting pretty annoying. You should only use one >and only one private tag per RM (without a version number) and just >move it around to reflect the state of your private tree. > >On a related note, I would like to remove all of the n

Re: Tagged the tree, one more time

2003-01-15 Thread Greg Ames
Roy T. Fielding wrote: Private tags are getting pretty annoying. You should only use one and only one private tag per RM (without a version number) and just move it around to reflect the state of your private tree. I prefer the current practice with version numbers that change if the content of

Re: Tagged the tree, one more time

2003-01-15 Thread Greg Ames
Sander Striker wrote: Hi, I just tagged STRIKER_2_0_44_PRE3. I think this is going to be our .44. It would be nice to give it one more day on daedalus and get some +1s on it. But we're running _PRE2 now and there are bunches of changes, my own included. I'd prefer to see it go longer. Greg

Re: Tagged the tree, one more time

2003-01-16 Thread Aaron Bannert
Please don't remove AGB_BEFORE_AAA_CHANGES until after the next few -2.0 releases. -aaron On Tuesday, January 14, 2003, at 02:55 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: Private tags are getting pretty annoying. You should only use one and only one private tag per RM (without a version number) and just mo

Re: Tagged the tree, one more time

2003-01-17 Thread Greg Ames
Sander Striker wrote: I just tagged STRIKER_2_0_44_PRE3. I think this is going to be our .44. It would be nice to give it one more day on daedalus and get some +1s on it. +1 for release as 2.0.44, and thanks for your efforts. Greg