On 3/18/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry Justin, tried to ping you last week even in anticipation of this
question, but you weren't to be found or were ignoring me ;-) I trust this
syncs with your expectations.
I wasn't ignoring you. However, anything other than email
On 3/1/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've enjoyed responding to Justin's detailed questions, and appreciate the
very
few comments which have arrived. That said; I'm closing this survey on March
8th, please get any final offers of help above, additional questions or
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 3/1/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've enjoyed responding to Justin's detailed questions, and appreciate the very
few comments which have arrived. That said; I'm closing this survey on March
8th, please get any final offers of help above,
On 3/1/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've enjoyed responding to Justin's detailed questions, and appreciate the
very
few comments which have arrived. That said; I'm closing this survey on March
8th, please get any final offers of help above, additional questions or
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 3/1/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've enjoyed responding to Justin's detailed questions, and appreciate the very
few comments which have arrived. That said; I'm closing this survey on March
8th, please get any final offers of help above,
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
In order to even consider this proposal, I need to take a quick poll...
Voulenteers who will continue to watch the progress of mod_aspdotnet
(oversight)?
Voulenteers who will actually test the module from time to time and vote on
it's release quality?
A product of the cli-dev incubation effort was the open sourcing of the
mod_aspdotnet connector between httpd-2.0 and Microsoft's ASP.NET engine.
Some background...
It is notably tied to Microsoft as the code uses a C++ IJW (It Just Works)
approach to compiling native and managed code in the
On 2/15/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A product of the cli-dev incubation effort was the open sourcing of the
mod_aspdotnet connector between httpd-2.0 and Microsoft's ASP.NET engine.
Some background...
Excellent. I've been delegated by the Board to oversee our timely
A product of the cli-dev incubation effort was the open sourcing of the
mod_aspdotnet connector between httpd-2.0 and Microsoft's ASP.NET engine.
Some background...
It is notably tied to Microsoft as the code uses a C++ IJW (It Just Works)
approach to compiling native and managed code in the
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
* It's time to move mod_aspdotnet into the 'core'. Not as a default installed
module, perhaps not even in the modules/arch/win32/ tree (it would increase
the size of the unix distributions for no gain), but simply consider it where
it lays in svn as part
On 2/15/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A product of the cli-dev incubation effort was the open sourcing of the
mod_aspdotnet connector between httpd-2.0 and Microsoft's ASP.NET engine.
Some background...
Excellent. I've been delegated by the Board to oversee our timely
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 2/15/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The second major change to be made is driven by the httpd-2.2 proxy framework.
Because all applications are in effect proxied from the front end server, the
fit of mod_proxy_aspdotnet should be self-evident.
12 matches
Mail list logo
