Jeff Trawick writes:
see attached file
let us know how it turns out... also, maybe some of the west coast folks
will have a clue once they wake up
I have not found a real solution yet, and it seems that my posting to
comp.unix.solaris didn't make it.
However, I have a preliminary
This appers to be too difficult for the users list ... can anyone here help?
Solaris 9 8/03 SPARC
gcc 2.95.3
Solaris /usr/ccs/bin compiler tools
apache 1.3.29/mod_ssl-2.8.16-1.3.29/openssl-0.9.7c/mm-1.3.0
I am using the same build procedure and sources as on Solaris 8 machines.
All works
Lars Hecking wrote:
# ./apachectl configtest
Syntax error on line 205 of /usr/local/apache/conf/httpd.conf:
Cannot load /usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_mime_magic.so into server: ld.so.1:
/usr/local/apache/bin/httpd: fatal: relocation error: file
/usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_mime_magic.so:
mm library is compiled statically only, and I have verified during make
that the correct cpp/ld paths are used.
Can you do a test build with pure, unpatched Apache 1.3.latest and see if
you hit the same error?
Plain, unpatched 1.3.29 without mod_ssl and mm gives the same error.
#
Lars Hecking wrote:
Plain, unpatched 1.3.29 without mod_ssl and mm gives the same error.
# ./apachectl configtest
Syntax error on line 205 of /WWWserv/conf/httpd.conf:
Cannot load /WWWserv/libexec/mod_mime_magic.so into server: ld.so.1:
/WWWserv/bin/httpd: fatal: relocation error: file
latest == 29 is a sufficient approximation :) (I don't recall any build
changes whatsoever recently)
I can try it on a Solaris 9 box. What configure invocation are you using
and which compiler?
gcc 2.95.3, no GNU binutils. apache is configured with
OPTIM=-O2 \
./configure \
Lars Hecking wrote
:
gcc 2.95.3, no GNU binutils. apache is configured with
OPTIM=-O2 \
./configure \
I tweaked only the prefix option and it appears to work fine for me. I too
have gcc 2.95.3 (from Sun freeware CD I'd guess) and AFAIK I'm not using GNU
binutils either.
What does this show
I tweaked only the prefix option and it appears to work fine for me. I too
have gcc 2.95.3 (from Sun freeware CD I'd guess) and AFAIK I'm not using
GNU binutils either.
What does this show for your build?
$ nm /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd | grep alloc
[403] | 0| 0|FILE
Lars Hecking wrote:
$ nm /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd | grep alloc
[403] | 0| 0|FILE |LOCL |0|ABS|alloc.c
[406] |518516| 4|OBJT |LOCL |0|13 |alloc_mutex
[1675] |156472| 8|FUNC |GLOB |0|10 |ap_cleanup_alloc
[1332] |156420|
Your libc references have that SYSVABI_1.3 tag, which mine done. My
Solaris 9 is a bit older. I have no idea what the problem is.
Hhm. I'll take this to the sunmanagers list then ...
$ cat /etc/release
Solaris 9 12/02 s9s_u2wos_10a SPARC
Copyright
Hhm. I'll take this to the sunmanagers list then ...
Jeff, one more thing: Could you email me, off-list, the output of
truss /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -t? You can use -o to capture the
output into a file.
Lars Hecking wrote:
Jeff, one more thing: Could you email me, off-list, the output of
truss /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -t? You can use -o to capture the
output into a file.
done
On Nov 24, 2003, at 9:04 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Your libc references have that SYSVABI_1.3 tag, which mine done. My
Solaris 9 is a bit older. I have no idea what the problem is.
I've run into this exact issue before, as well.
Only, on Solaris 8 servers, and the offending modules being
13 matches
Mail list logo
