* André Malo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Enrico Weigelt wrote:
>
> > * André Malo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > * Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> > > > Why is pcre bundled anyway ? Other packages (ie zlib or expat) are
> > > > also not bundled, so why pcre ?
> > >
> > > vendor branch.
> >
> > how do
* Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> * André Malo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> > > Why is pcre bundled anyway ? Other packages (ie zlib or expat) are
> > > also not bundled, so why pcre ?
> >
> > vendor branch.
>
> how does it answer my question ?
It gives you a piece of informat
* André Malo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Enrico Weigelt wrote:
>
> > Why is pcre bundled anyway ? Other packages (ie zlib or expat) are
> > also not bundled, so why pcre ?
>
> vendor branch.
how does it answer my question ?
cu
--
* Richard Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why is pcre bundled anyway ? Other packages (ie zlib or expat) are
> > also not bundled, so why pcre ?
>
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27550
Doesnt answer the question, instead clearly showing in what trouble
we run when doing
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 05:43:58AM +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> * Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Why bundling 3rd-party packages anyway ?!
>
> I personally *always* use sysetm libs instead of bundled libs when
> some packages do such bundling. But I'm really
* Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> Why is pcre bundled anyway ? Other packages (ie zlib or expat) are
> also not bundled, so why pcre ?
vendor branch.
nd
* Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi folks,
Why bundling 3rd-party packages anyway ?!
I personally *always* use sysetm libs instead of bundled libs when
some packages do such bundling. But I'm really unhappy that apache2's
configure does not provide an option for doing that on pcre.
