mod_cache caching the 301 Moved Permanently

2005-04-20 Thread Devendra Singh
Hi, I am writing to the Developer List because I did not get any response on the Users List and thought that the topic might be relevant to the dev list. If a request comes for a directory w/o trailing slash, it gets cached and the subsequent requests see: Moved Permanently The document has mov

Re: mod_cache caching the 301 Moved Permanently

2005-04-21 Thread Devendra Singh
At 21/04/05 10:04 (), Devendra Singh wrote: Hi, I am writing to the Developer List because I did not get any response on the Users List and thought that the topic might be relevant to the dev list. If a request comes for a directory w/o trailing slash, it gets cached and the subsequent requests

Re: mod_cache caching the 301 Moved Permanently

2005-04-21 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 10:04:54AM +0530, Devendra Singh wrote: > Hi, > > I am writing to the Developer List because I did not get any response on > the Users List and thought that the topic might be relevant to the dev list. > > If a request comes for a directory w/o trailing slash, it gets cac

Re: mod_cache caching the 301 Moved Permanently

2005-04-21 Thread Olaf van der Spek
On 4/22/05, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 10:04:54AM +0530, Devendra Singh wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am writing to the Developer List because I did not get any response on > > the Users List and thought that the topic might be relevant to the dev list. > > >

Re: mod_cache caching the 301 Moved Permanently

2005-04-22 Thread r . pluem
Sander Striker wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> The problem seems to be, that the proxied backend server that is >> cached via mod_disk_cache originally >> delivers HTTP status 301 and the Location >> http://www.beach-clothing.com/where-to-buy/, but once cached >> mod_disk_cache delivers H

Re: mod_cache caching the 301 Moved Permanently

2005-04-22 Thread r . pluem
Olaf van der Spek wrote: > On 4/22/05, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [..cut..] >> >>I don't get it. What's your problem? -- justin > > > The 'here' link is to http://www.beach-clothing.com:8080/where-to-buy/ > while he wants it do be to http://www.beach-clothing.com/where

Re: mod_cache caching the 301 Moved Permanently

2005-04-22 Thread Sander Striker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The problem seems to be, that the proxied backend server that is cached via mod_disk_cache originally delivers HTTP status 301 and the Location http://www.beach-clothing.com/where-to-buy/, but once cached mod_disk_cache delivers HTTP status 200 instead of 301 (but correct

Re: mod_cache caching the 301 Moved Permanently

2005-04-24 Thread Devendra Singh
At 22/04/2005 11:21 (), Olaf van der Spek wrote: On 4/22/05, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 10:04:54AM +0530, Devendra Singh wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am writing to the Developer List because I did not get any response on > > the Users List and thought that th

Re: mod_cache caching the 301 Moved Permanently

2005-07-07 Thread Hansjoerg Pehofer
Hi, it has been some time since the original thread. This is in reply to [1]. Sander Striker wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> The problem seems to be, that the proxied backend server that is >> cached via mod_disk_cache originally >> delivers HTTP status 301 and the Location >> http://www.

Re: mod_cache caching the 301 Moved Permanently

2005-07-07 Thread r . pluem
Have you checked http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200504.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ? It contains a small patch which was not discussed any further here. Regards Rüdiger Hansjoerg Pehofer wrote: > Hi, > > it has been some time since the original thread. > This is in reply to

Re: mod_cache caching the 301 Moved Permanently

2005-07-12 Thread Hansjoerg Pehofer
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 09:22:25PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Have you checked > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200504.mbox/[EMAIL > PROTECTED] ? > > It contains a small patch which was not discussed any further here. Hi, i tried your patch today. Unfortunately c

Re: mod_cache caching the 301 Moved Permanently

2005-07-12 Thread r . pluem
Hansjoerg Pehofer wrote: > On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 09:22:25PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>Have you checked >>http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200504.mbox/[EMAIL >>PROTECTED] ? >> >>It contains a small patch which was not discussed any further here. > > > Hi, > > i

Re: mod_cache caching the 301 Moved Permanently

2005-07-12 Thread Sander Striker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hansjoerg Pehofer wrote: On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 09:22:25PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you checked http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200504.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ? It contains a small patch which was not discussed any further here.

Re: mod_cache caching the 301 Moved Permanently

2005-07-12 Thread r . pluem
Sander Striker wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [..cut..] >> Question to the mod_cache gurus: >> While mod_mem_cache restores the status during recall_headers in >> Apache 2.0.54 >> it seems that mod_mem_cache does not do this in Apache 2.1.x (Maybe >> fixed meanwhile >> my latest revision of mo

Re: mod_cache caching the 301 Moved Permanently

2005-07-12 Thread Sander Striker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sander Striker wrote: [...] That said, in 2.1, I think we should restore status in mod_cache, not in the cache Sorry for being confused. But maybe my question was not completely correct. It was fine; I'm being 'lazy' and not looking at the code, but going by memor