On 02 Nov 2010, at 10:34 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
The lack of this one feature is the most cited reason I've been given
for why people have moved away from mod_include as a template
processor to other template processors within other servers. Rather
than moving to an entirely new type of server, I'd
As long as the default behavior continues unchanged, it seems harmless.
I just wonder how many users would find a use for it? I assume you have
a use case in mind?
Dan
On 02 Nov 2010, at 7:02 PM, Dan Poirier wrote:
As long as the default behavior continues unchanged, it seems
harmless.
I just wonder how many users would find a use for it? I assume you
have
a use case in mind?
The lack of this one feature is the most cited reason I've been given
for
On Tue, 2 Nov 2010 19:23:07 +0200
Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
The lack of this one feature is the most cited reason I've been given
for why people have moved away from mod_include as a template
processor to other template processors within other servers. Rather
than moving to
Hi all,
In mod_include, we currently only allow 200 OK responses to be
included within the document. If any other code is returned, we
replace the document body with a hard coded error string. This places
a significant limitation on the usefulness of mod_include.
Ideally, the included
