At 11:19 AM 3/5/2004, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[SNIP]
>>--On Friday, March 5, 2004 12:20 AM -0600 "William A. Rowe, Jr."
>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> But I have a better proposal - let us simply move bac
At 11:11 AM 3/5/2004, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>I would really like to get the TLS/SSL upgrade functionality into the
>2.0.49 release. If Sander is wanting to start the relase on Monday, I
>would like to do whatever is easiest to get this patch in.
-1 - too big a change too late in the cycle. +1 f
>-Original Message-
>From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[SNIP]
>--On Friday, March 5, 2004 12:20 AM -0600 "William A. Rowe, Jr."
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> But I have a better proposal - let us simply move back the
>entire mod_ssl 2.1
>> back to 2.0. Only binary com
Brad Nicholes wrote:
I would really like to get the TLS/SSL upgrade functionality into the
2.0.49 release. If Sander is wanting to start the relase on Monday, I
would like to do whatever is easiest to get this patch in.
Brad
Brad Nicholes
Senior Software Engineer
Novell, Inc., the leading pro
I would really like to get the TLS/SSL upgrade functionality into the
2.0.49 release. If Sander is wanting to start the relase on Monday, I
would like to do whatever is easiest to get this patch in.
Brad
Brad Nicholes
Senior Software Engineer
Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business
--On Friday, March 5, 2004 12:20 AM -0600 "William A. Rowe, Jr."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But I have a better proposal - let us simply move back the entire mod_ssl 2.1
back to 2.0. Only binary compat issues would need review. But too many
good things have happened on 2.1 to this specific comp
Brad I'm plus 1, especially if we can cause libwww to instigate this connection
mode for httpd-test and prove that it behaves per the RFC convention.
But I have a better proposal - let us simply move back the entire mod_ssl 2.1
back to 2.0. Only binary compat issues would need review. But too ma
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 09:08:28PM -0700, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>I would like to resurrect an old discussion. About a year and half
> ago rbb and wrowe committed a patch for mod_ssl to provide the SSLEngine
> upgrade capability. It seems that one of the reasons for not back
> porting it to the
I would like to resurrect an old discussion. About a year and half
ago rbb and wrowe committed a patch for mod_ssl to provide the SSLEngine
upgrade capability. It seems that one of the reasons for not back
porting it to the 2.0 tree was because there weren't really any clients
that supported i
