Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On 10/8/07, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Thoughts on adding mod_substitute to 2.2.x under experimental?
>
> if in 2.2.x at all, why not in the normal modules directory? is it
> really experimental, or is experimental considered a political
> compromise, or is
On 10/8/07, Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 10/8/07, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thoughts on adding mod_substitute to 2.2.x under experimental?
>
> if in 2.2.x at all, why not in the normal modules directory? is it
> really experimental, or is experimental considere
On 10/8/07, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thoughts on adding mod_substitute to 2.2.x under experimental?
if in 2.2.x at all, why not in the normal modules directory? is it
really experimental, or is experimental considered a political
compromise, or is there something else I'm not th
Thoughts on adding mod_substitute to 2.2.x under experimental?
