[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, I don't think Solaris uses the same structure/functions for passing
fd's between processes. I had originally planned to use a Solaris box for
the second port, but I don't have access to one yet. I keep looking on
e-bay for a good x86 box
Tsuyoshi SASAMOTO wrote:
If '-D_XPG4_2 -D__EXTENSIONS__' are added to CPPFLAGS during the configure
process, perchild will compile relatively cleanly under Solaris 8 and
result in a binary that actually serves content!!
Please see the standards(5) man page. -D_XPG4_2 is an internal
At 2:31 PM +0900 9/11/02, Tsuyoshi SASAMOTO wrote:
If '-D_XPG4_2 -D__EXTENSIONS__' are added to CPPFLAGS during the configure
process, perchild will compile relatively cleanly under Solaris 8 and
result in a binary that actually serves content!!
Please see the standards(5) man page.
Looks like we should be using the later, for Unix 95. Doesn't appear that
we need Unix 98
But... there's no reason to avoid using -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500.
I've built perchild httpd with -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D__EXTENSIONS__,
and it works well.
Tsuyoshi SASAMOTO
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If '-D_XPG4_2 -D__EXTENSIONS__' are added to CPPFLAGS during the configure
process, perchild will compile relatively cleanly under Solaris 8 and
result in a binary that actually serves content!! Haven't yet
playing with using the actual uid/gid aspects of perchild yet.
I'm looking to see what
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 01:07:30PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
If '-D_XPG4_2 -D__EXTENSIONS__' are added to CPPFLAGS during the configure
process, perchild will compile relatively cleanly under Solaris 8 and
result in a binary that actually serves content!! Haven't yet
playing with using the
At 11:07 AM -0700 9/10/02, Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 01:07:30PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
If '-D_XPG4_2 -D__EXTENSIONS__' are added to CPPFLAGS during the configure
process, perchild will compile relatively cleanly under Solaris 8 and
result in a binary that actually
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Jim Jagielski wrote:
At 11:07 AM -0700 9/10/02, Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 01:07:30PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
If '-D_XPG4_2 -D__EXTENSIONS__' are added to CPPFLAGS during the configure
process, perchild will compile relatively cleanly under
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm also concerned about breakage... Thing is, we're using msghdr for
the recvmsg() calls.
Yeah, I don't think Solaris uses the same structure/functions for passing
fd's between processes.
Well, it looks like it *can* :)
That doesn't mean that it
If '-D_XPG4_2 -D__EXTENSIONS__' are added to CPPFLAGS during the configure
process, perchild will compile relatively cleanly under Solaris 8 and
result in a binary that actually serves content!!
Please see the standards(5) man page. -D_XPG4_2 is an internal macro,
so it shouldn't be
10 matches
Mail list logo