Re: perchild under Solaris 8

2002-09-11 Thread Pier Fumagalli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah, I don't think Solaris uses the same structure/functions for passing fd's between processes. I had originally planned to use a Solaris box for the second port, but I don't have access to one yet. I keep looking on e-bay for a good x86 box

Re: perchild under Solaris 8

2002-09-11 Thread Jim Jagielski
Tsuyoshi SASAMOTO wrote: If '-D_XPG4_2 -D__EXTENSIONS__' are added to CPPFLAGS during the configure process, perchild will compile relatively cleanly under Solaris 8 and result in a binary that actually serves content!! Please see the standards(5) man page. -D_XPG4_2 is an internal

Re: perchild under Solaris 8

2002-09-11 Thread Jim Jagielski
At 2:31 PM +0900 9/11/02, Tsuyoshi SASAMOTO wrote: If '-D_XPG4_2 -D__EXTENSIONS__' are added to CPPFLAGS during the configure process, perchild will compile relatively cleanly under Solaris 8 and result in a binary that actually serves content!! Please see the standards(5) man page.

Re: perchild under Solaris 8

2002-09-11 Thread Tsuyoshi SASAMOTO
Looks like we should be using the later, for Unix 95. Doesn't appear that we need Unix 98 But... there's no reason to avoid using -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500. I've built perchild httpd with -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D__EXTENSIONS__, and it works well. Tsuyoshi SASAMOTO [EMAIL PROTECTED]

perchild under Solaris 8

2002-09-10 Thread Jim Jagielski
If '-D_XPG4_2 -D__EXTENSIONS__' are added to CPPFLAGS during the configure process, perchild will compile relatively cleanly under Solaris 8 and result in a binary that actually serves content!! Haven't yet playing with using the actual uid/gid aspects of perchild yet. I'm looking to see what

Re: perchild under Solaris 8

2002-09-10 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 01:07:30PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: If '-D_XPG4_2 -D__EXTENSIONS__' are added to CPPFLAGS during the configure process, perchild will compile relatively cleanly under Solaris 8 and result in a binary that actually serves content!! Haven't yet playing with using the

Re: perchild under Solaris 8

2002-09-10 Thread Jim Jagielski
At 11:07 AM -0700 9/10/02, Aaron Bannert wrote: On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 01:07:30PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: If '-D_XPG4_2 -D__EXTENSIONS__' are added to CPPFLAGS during the configure process, perchild will compile relatively cleanly under Solaris 8 and result in a binary that actually

Re: perchild under Solaris 8

2002-09-10 Thread rbb
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Jim Jagielski wrote: At 11:07 AM -0700 9/10/02, Aaron Bannert wrote: On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 01:07:30PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: If '-D_XPG4_2 -D__EXTENSIONS__' are added to CPPFLAGS during the configure process, perchild will compile relatively cleanly under

Re: perchild under Solaris 8

2002-09-10 Thread Jim Jagielski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm also concerned about breakage... Thing is, we're using msghdr for the recvmsg() calls. Yeah, I don't think Solaris uses the same structure/functions for passing fd's between processes. Well, it looks like it *can* :) That doesn't mean that it

Re: perchild under Solaris 8

2002-09-10 Thread Tsuyoshi SASAMOTO
If '-D_XPG4_2 -D__EXTENSIONS__' are added to CPPFLAGS during the configure process, perchild will compile relatively cleanly under Solaris 8 and result in a binary that actually serves content!! Please see the standards(5) man page. -D_XPG4_2 is an internal macro, so it shouldn't be