Re: svn commit: r1040177 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http/http_protocol.c

2010-12-03 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 02.12.2010 10:39, schrieb Joe Orton: On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 04:37:49PM -, fua...@apache.org wrote: URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1040177view=rev Log: Supress compiler warning. ... == ---

Re: svn commit: r1040177 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http/http_protocol.c

2010-12-03 Thread Malte S. Stretz
On Friday 03 December 2010 09:52:06 Guenter Knauf wrote: Am 02.12.2010 10:39, schrieb Joe Orton: On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 04:37:49PM -, fua...@apache.org wrote: +#ifdef __WATCOMC__ +#pragma disable_message(105) +#endif Eww. Do you really need to litter the source code with this

Re: svn commit: r1040177 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http/http_protocol.c

2010-12-03 Thread Joe Orton
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 09:52:06AM +0100, Guenter Knauf wrote: Am 02.12.2010 10:39, schrieb Joe Orton: On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 04:37:49PM -, fua...@apache.org wrote: URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1040177view=rev Log: Supress compiler warning. ...

Re: svn commit: r1040177 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http/http_protocol.c

2010-12-03 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 03.12.2010 15:26, schrieb Joe Orton: This is pretty ugly, please don't. If you think this warning from this compiler matters so much, set up some kind of CI system which alerts you when they are introduced. Littering platform-independent parts of the source with ugly #pragmas is not

Re: svn commit: r1040177 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http/http_protocol.c

2010-12-02 Thread Joe Orton
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 04:37:49PM -, fua...@apache.org wrote: URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1040177view=rev Log: Supress compiler warning. ... == --- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http/http_protocol.c