Re: svn commit: r158303 - httpd/httpd/trunk/buildconf

2005-03-22 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 06:38 PM 3/21/2005, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: Since moving to Subversion, having apr and apr-util at the same level as httpd is my typical working copy layout, so I'm definitely +1 on this change. srclib/apr and srclib/apr-util don't really make sense anymore, IMO. -- justin Yup, my srclib

Re: svn commit: r158303 - httpd/httpd/trunk/buildconf

2005-03-22 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 11:11 PM 3/21/2005, Paul Querna wrote: Yep, i was tried of passing --with-apr and --with-apr-util to ./buildconf -- this has nothing to do with ./config.nice, and I thought making a ./buildconf.nice would of been a little excessive. Of course! Now I'm on the same page with you. Actually,

Re: svn commit: r158303 - httpd/httpd/trunk/buildconf

2005-03-22 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Tuesday, March 22, 2005 3:22 PM -0600 William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Of course! Now I'm on the same page with you. Actually, I believe a buildconf.nice is a better solution (for reasons in my other note.) We really have no say-so about what is sitting in the directory

buildconf.nice, WAS: Re: svn commit: r158303 - httpd/httpd/trunk/buildconf

2005-03-22 Thread Sander Striker
Justin Erenkrantz wrote: --On Tuesday, March 22, 2005 3:22 PM -0600 William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Of course! Now I'm on the same page with you. Actually, I believe a buildconf.nice is a better solution (for reasons in my other note.) We really have no say-so about what is

Re: svn commit: r158303 - httpd/httpd/trunk/buildconf

2005-03-22 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 04:02 PM 3/22/2005, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: --On Tuesday, March 22, 2005 3:22 PM -0600 William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It only matters if the directory is present and contains the files we need. I just think a buildconf.nice would be overkill here. -- justin Are we certain

Re: svn commit: r158303 - httpd/httpd/trunk/buildconf

2005-03-21 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 11:26 PM 3/19/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: pquerna Date: Sat Mar 19 21:26:22 2005 New Revision: 158303 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=158303 Log: Test for APR and APR-Util one directory bellow httpd too. I like not having to put them inside srclib. grumf I'm not

Re: svn commit: r158303 - httpd/httpd/trunk/buildconf

2005-03-21 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 05:19:56PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: grumf I'm not keen on this change, since it complicates things unnecessarily - some day we discover a tag and roll organized like this out of the blue? Does config.nice not do what you want? Especially if you rename it

Re: svn commit: r158303 - httpd/httpd/trunk/buildconf

2005-03-21 Thread Sander Striker
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: At 11:26 PM 3/19/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: pquerna Date: Sat Mar 19 21:26:22 2005 New Revision: 158303 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=158303 Log: Test for APR and APR-Util one directory bellow httpd too. I like not having to put them

Re: svn commit: r158303 - httpd/httpd/trunk/buildconf

2005-03-21 Thread Paul Querna
Sander Striker wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: At 11:26 PM 3/19/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: pquerna Date: Sat Mar 19 21:26:22 2005 New Revision: 158303 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=158303 Log: Test for APR and APR-Util one directory bellow httpd too. I like not