Re: svn commit: r160645 - httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS

2005-05-05 Thread Greg Ames
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Will, can you help me understand your concern? this doesn't change the headers of the POST request. it only affects which new headers we generate for the new SSI GET subrequest. Well I totally understand the issue - I'm blowing up in some PHP code due to an earlier

Re: svn commit: r160645 - httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS

2005-05-05 Thread Joe Schaefer
Greg Ames [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: [...] So I'm effectively arguing that apreq should be the arbiter of bodies. If the subrequest calls apreq API's (rather than trusting headers which should be handled in our HTTP filter stack) then everything would be

Re: svn commit: r160645 - httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS

2005-04-28 Thread Greg Ames
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * don't propagate input headers describing a body to a GET subrequest with no body @@ -219,12 +220,34 @@ -1: jerenkrantz (read_length isn't a sufficient check to see if a body is present in the request; presence of T-E and C-L in

Re: svn commit: r160645 - httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS

2005-04-28 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 03:19 PM 4/28/2005, Greg Ames wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * don't propagate input headers describing a body to a GET subrequest with no body @@ -219,12 +220,34 @@ -1: jerenkrantz (read_length isn't a sufficient check to see if a body is present in

mod_version for 2.0.x, was Re: svn commit: r160645 - httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS

2005-04-10 Thread Paul Querna
Paul Querna wrote: Okay, I was backporting this, but ran into a few problems. First, it requires a minor MMN bump to add the version API stuff. Thats not too bad, and I was making a patch for all of it. The biggest problem is that my working copy in subversion broke. 'svn diff' just doesn't

Re: svn commit: r160645 - httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS

2005-04-09 Thread Sander Striker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: wrowe Date: Fri Apr 8 17:38:46 2005 New Revision: 160645 @@ -208,7 +209,7 @@ * Win32: Move call to mpm_service_install to the rewrite_args hook from the post_config hook. http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=154319 - +1: stoddard,

Re: svn commit: r160645 - httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS

2005-04-09 Thread Paul Querna
Sander Striker wrote: Paul, Justin, could you either provide me with a complete patch against 2.0.x or add the revisions I need to merge? I am backporting mod_version right now.

Re: svn commit: r160645 - httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS

2005-04-09 Thread Paul Querna
Paul Querna wrote: Sander Striker wrote: Paul, Justin, could you either provide me with a complete patch against 2.0.x or add the revisions I need to merge? I am backporting mod_version right now. Okay, I was backporting this, but ran into a few problems. First, it requires a minor MMN bump to