Roy T. Fielding wrote:
So, I'm -0.9 on the patch, even though it isn't much worse than
the existing code. I'd be -1 if I could be sure what it did.
And I wouldn't debate it... back to the drawing board. As an improvement
to the behavior I support it, in terms of style it got a -0.5 from me,
If we're in backport season, I have a quick patch that I whipped up
yesterday to fix mod_disk_cache on 2.2.x on systems that have
APR_SENDFILE_ENABLED but EnableSendfile Off.
Issac
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Votes and Notes; the first four I would like to see
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
next time http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37680
would help so the fruit hangs even lower.
Thanks Jim!
The other fatal bug is:
* mpm_winnt: Fix return values from wait_for_many_objects.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
The other fatal bug is:
* mpm_winnt: Fix return values from wait_for_many_objects.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrevision=428029
2.2.x version of patch:
Trunk version works
+
Jim Jagielski wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
The other fatal bug is:
* mpm_winnt: Fix return values from wait_for_many_objects.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrevision=428029
2.2.x version of patch:
Trunk version works
+
On Dec 20, 2006, at 5:14 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
* mpm_winnt: Fix return values from wait_for_many_objects.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrevision=428029
2.2.x version of patch:
Trunk version works
+
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Votes and Notes; the first four I would like to see applied before
tagging 1.2.4; add a better patch for the winnt mpm wait patch
that makes this reviewable (sometimes -U3 just isn't enough context.)
As Ruediger guessed and committed (thanks!) we are now two more
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 16:34:24 -0600
William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see two final state bugs... I'm about to finish vetting niq's patch
for listen reconfig which pegs httpd at 100% cpu
For the record, not my patch. It's attached to the PR, and the
contributor is currently
Nick Kew wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 16:34:24 -0600
William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see two final state bugs... I'm about to finish vetting niq's patch
for listen reconfig which pegs httpd at 100% cpu
For the record, not my patch. It's attached to the PR, and the
