I'm running the following code inside of an apache module:
apr_thread_t *thd_arr;
apr_pool_create(ai-mp, NULL);
apr_threadattr_t *thd_attr;
apr_threadattr_create(thd_attr, (ai-mp));
apr_threadattr_detach_set(thd_attr,1);
apr_thread_create(thd_arr, thd_attr, ExecuteAction, ai, ai-mp);
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:15:41 -0400
Croteau, Beau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm running the following code inside of an apache module:
You keep asking the same thing, but we need more information
to say anything useful.
[14:29] crobe03 Does anybody have any idea why thread handles would
be
On Windows where a case insensitive, but case preserving file system
is used, my understanding is that one can use the
APR_FILEPATH_TRUENAME option to apr_filepath_merge() to convert a file
system path into one which has case set to the actual values. Ie.,
documentation says:
/** Resolve the
Hi all,
Looking through 'server/mpm/worker/worker.c' I have found such a
combination of TODO/FIXME comments:
1)
/* TODO: requests_this_child should be synchronized - aaron */
if (requests_this_child = 0) {
2)
requests_this_child--; /* FIXME: should be synchronized - aaron */
And I can not see
Hi,
I'm looking for an example of module code that uses the monitor hook.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Cheers,
Mark Humphries
onsdag 13 juni 2007 skrev Allen Pulsifer:
The attached patch is the final one and applies to 2.2.4?
--
Regards // Oden Eriksson
--- server/request.c 2006-07-12 05:38:44.0 +0200
+++ server/request.c.oden 2007-06-14 09:35:48.0 +0200
@@ -931,13 +931,21 @@
#ifdef
The attached patch is the final one and applies to 2.2.4?
Yes, that is the final patch. It is a diff from v.2.2.4.
The indentation might not be quite correct after applying that patch. Due
space-to-tab conversion issues with my editor, I had to do a diff -u -b,
and the patch is not correctly
Here's a proper diff, without the spacing issue. (It was actually a line
terminator issue, caused by editing the file under Windows.)
--- request.c-2.2.4 2007-06-14 06:47:44.850623600 -0400
+++ request.c 2007-06-13 21:34:01.659559100 -0400
@@ -931,12 +931,20 @@
#ifdef
I'm trying to understand why mod_proxy_ajp exists and what it provides
that mod_proxy_http doesn't.
ajp13 is a binary protocol which should make the ajp13 tomcat connector
a bit more efficient than the http11 connector; an incremental
performance improvement. obtained at the expense of added
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Bill Stoddard
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 14. Juni 2007 15:28
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: mod_proxy_ajp or mod_proxy_http?
I'm trying to understand why mod_proxy_ajp exists and what it
provides
that mod_proxy_http doesn't.
ajp13 is a
Hi all,
I've got some response which shows that I was not clear enough in my previous
post. Fullproof solution would be:
Index: server/mpm/worker/worker.c
===
--- server/mpm/worker/worker.c (revision 545597)
+++
The thread is created inside of the gsoap_handler. Though these threads
aren't necessarily mapped to a one to one gsoap_handler call. We have a
web service 'startup' function that creates several background threads
to do the processing and from there don't necessary have to have the
Croteau, Beau wrote:
The thread is created inside of the gsoap_handler. Though these threads
aren't necessarily mapped to a one to one gsoap_handler call. We have a
web service 'startup' function that creates several background threads
to do the processing and from there don't necessary have
On 14/06/07, Dmytro Fedonin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Looking through 'server/mpm/worker/worker.c' I have found such a
combination of TODO/FIXME comments:
1)
/* TODO: requests_this_child should be synchronized - aaron */
if (requests_this_child = 0) {
2)
requests_this_child--; /* FIXME:
On Thu, June 14, 2007 3:27 pm, Bill Stoddard wrote:
I'm trying to understand why mod_proxy_ajp exists and what it provides
that mod_proxy_http doesn't.
ajp13 is a binary protocol which should make the ajp13 tomcat connector
a bit more efficient than the http11 connector; an incremental
Bill Stoddard wrote:
I'm trying to understand why mod_proxy_ajp exists and what it provides
that mod_proxy_http doesn't.
ajp13 is a binary protocol which should make the ajp13 tomcat connector
a bit more efficient than the http11 connector; an incremental
performance improvement. obtained
I'm running the following code inside of an apache module (actually
inside of a web service running inside an apache module):
apr_thread_t *thd_arr;
apr_pool_create(ai-mp, NULL);
apr_threadattr_t *thd_attr;
apr_threadattr_create(thd_attr, (ai-mp));
apr_threadattr_detach_set(thd_attr,1);
Apache typically runs in C/POSIX locale. Is it possible/recommended to run
apache in other locale? Why I am asking is that if some apache module wants to
use mbtowc functions (wchar.h), is it ok to use it (as it affects the entire
process)? Is it recommended? Will it cause any issues with other
Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Bill Stoddard
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 14. Juni 2007 15:28
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: mod_proxy_ajp or mod_proxy_http?
I'm trying to understand why mod_proxy_ajp
Hi,
I will also add if there is known issue with this API call
ap_parse_uri(request_rec * r, const char * uri) is there any work around
available.
Waitin for replies. Thanx in advance
Sonia
On 6/14/07, sonia mukherjee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Thanx for the reply, i am already using
20 matches
Mail list logo
