RE: mod_proxy: Is smax=0 allowed ?

2007-09-05 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Seems like you are right about the smax=0. Luckily for you, according to the documentation you may control the persistency of the backend connection with the environment variable proxy-nokeepalive just like you can control the persistency of client connections with the environment variable

[patch] experimental UDP support in httpd-prefork/apr/apr-util trunk

2007-09-05 Thread Issac Goldstand
After taking my own advice on Sunday, I reworked everything I'd done for UDP support and focused on allowing the core I/O filters to work with non-connected sockets. I'm happy to report that I've come up with a working prototype for prefork that fully supports UDP and doesn't require substantial

Re: mod_proxy_balancer

2007-09-05 Thread Jim Jagielski
Hmmm... maybe: worker_is_initialized = (workers-s PROXY_WORKER_IS_INITIALIZED (workers)); instead of worker_is_initialized = workers-s ? PROXY_WORKER_IS_INITIALIZED (workers) : 0; ??

Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review

2007-09-05 Thread Oden Eriksson
tisdagen den 4 september 2007 skrev Jim Jagielski: Available for your testing pleasure, 3, count 'em, 3 Apache HTTP Server release candidate tarballs, located, as expected at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ This vote will run through Sept 6, 2007 and close Sept 7, unless otherwise

Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review

2007-09-05 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
+1:1.3.39 Builds with nothing except for signedness warnings on Win32 (mostly related to goofy FD_SET declarations by MS). So no adverse symptoms. Jim Jagielski wrote: On Sep 4, 2007, at 8:15 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote: Hmmm... yeah, bummer. If that's it though,

AW: mod_proxy_balancer

2007-09-05 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , VF-Group
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Jim Jagielski Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. September 2007 14:03 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: Re: mod_proxy_balancer Hmmm... maybe: worker_is_initialized = (workers-s PROXY_WORKER_IS_INITIALIZED (workers)); instead of

Re: AW: mod_proxy_balancer

2007-09-05 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Sep 5, 2007, at 9:04 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote: -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Jim Jagielski Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. September 2007 14:03 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: Re: mod_proxy_balancer Hmmm... maybe: worker_is_initialized = (workers-s

Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review

2007-09-05 Thread Jorge Schrauwen
On 9/5/07, Jorge Schrauwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/4/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Available for your testing pleasure, 3, count 'em, 3 Apache HTTP Server release candidate tarballs, located, as expected at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ This vote

lb_score and proxy_worker_stat

2007-09-05 Thread Jim Jagielski
Anyone have issues if I apply the below to trunk? Index: include/scoreboard.h === --- include/scoreboard.h(revision 572962) +++ include/scoreboard.h(working copy) @@ -40,6 +40,9 @@ #include apr_shm.h #include

Re: AW: mod_proxy_balancer

2007-09-05 Thread Vinicius Petrucci
Well... I will give another try... Indeed, modifying proxy_utils.c might not be a nice solution... On 05/09/07, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Jim Jagielski Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. September 2007 15:13 An: dev@httpd.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review

2007-09-05 Thread Brad Nicholes
On 9/4/2007 at 3:29 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Available for your testing pleasure, 3, count 'em, 3 Apache HTTP Server release candidate tarballs, located, as expected at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ This vote will run through

Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review

2007-09-05 Thread David McCreedy
Jim Jagielski wrote on Tuesday, September 04, 2007: This vote will run through Sept 6, 2007 and close Sept 7, unless otherwise noted... +/-1 (x == +1) [ ]apache_1.3.39 [ ]httpd-2.0.61 [ ]httpd-2.2.6 +1 for Apache_1.3.39 on TPF (TPF doesn't support Apache 2 yet

Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review

2007-09-05 Thread Jim Jagielski
Any indication on *how* it is broken? On Sep 5, 2007, at 1:07 PM, Steffen wrote: Sorry, it is on Win32 With 2.2.6 third party mod mod_fcgid (Fast cgi) is broken. With 2.2.5 RC it was all fine. mod_fcgid is widely used in the community with php. For me a big -1 Steffen - Original

Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review

2007-09-05 Thread Jim Jagielski
As a rough guess, I'm assuming it may have something to do with the stderr/stdout stuff... Anyone testing with mod_cgid? On Sep 5, 2007, at 1:54 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Any indication on *how* it is broken? On Sep 5, 2007, at 1:07 PM, Steffen wrote: Sorry, it is on Win32 With 2.2.6

Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review

2007-09-05 Thread Jorge Schrauwen
I don't have any cgi scripts so I tried to get the printenv test-cgi file to work. I get 500 and error_log has this. [Wed Sep 05 20:44:36 2007] [error] [client 87.66.74.14] Premature end of script headers: printenv.pl [Wed Sep 05 20:50:24 2007] [error] [client 87.66.74.14] Premature end of script

Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review

2007-09-05 Thread Steffen
little things: mod_bucketeer.so is not build out of the box with Win32 gui-build. zlib1.dll is now copied to /bin , seems to me not necessary. Steffen - Original Message - From: Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: dev@httpd.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 04 September,

Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review

2007-09-05 Thread Jim Jagielski
Is this Win32? On Sep 5, 2007, at 2:52 PM, Jorge Schrauwen wrote: I don't have any cgi scripts so I tried to get the printenv test- cgi file to work. I get 500 and error_log has this. [Wed Sep 05 20:44:36 2007] [error] [client 87.66.74.14] Premature end of script headers: printenv.pl [Wed

Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review

2007-09-05 Thread Steffen
I get this kind off error too when stopping. Never seen before: Failed to dup STDIN: Bad file descriptor. Error in my_thread_global_end(): 251 threads didn't exit - Original Message - From: Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: dev@httpd.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 04

Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review

2007-09-05 Thread Steffen
Also mod_perl is not working here with Win32. No indication in the logs. Steffen - Original Message - From: Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: dev@httpd.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 04 September, 2007 23:29 Subject: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release

Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review

2007-09-05 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Steffen wrote: little things: mod_bucketeer.so is not build out of the box with Win32 gui-build. Not necessary (except for testers). Trivial for the developer to create (along with many similar testing modules - instead of building the BuildBin target, use BuildAll target. zlib1.dll is now

Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review

2007-09-05 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Steffen wrote: I get this kind off error too when stopping. Never seen before: Failed to dup STDIN: Bad file descriptor. Error in my_thread_global_end(): 251 threads didn't exit I expect you are talking about mod_fcgid again?

Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review

2007-09-05 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Jorge Schrauwen wrote: I don't have any cgi scripts so I tried to get the printenv test-cgi file to work. I get 500 and error_log has this. [Wed Sep 05 20:44:36 2007] [error] [client 87.66.74.14 http://87.66.74.14] Premature end of script headers: printenv.pl [Wed Sep 05 20:50:24 2007]

Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review

2007-09-05 Thread Steffen
I have no zlib1.dll on my box and mod_deflate works fine. It's included/static in mod-deflate.so. Next time I shall ship it too, does not harm. Steffen - Original Message - From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: dev@httpd.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 05 September, 2007

Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review

2007-09-05 Thread Steffen
Nope, was not running mod_fcgid. Steffen - Original Message - From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: dev@httpd.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 05 September, 2007 21:44 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review Steffen wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review

2007-09-05 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Steffen wrote: I have no zlib1.dll on my box and mod_deflate works fine. It's included/static in mod-deflate.so. Next time I shall ship it too, does not harm. FYI - I haven't dug into the theory, but I'd presumed a possible race and certainly suboptimal behavior if you go with OpenSSL's

Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review

2007-09-05 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Jorge Schrauwen wrote: I don't have any cgi scripts so I tried to get the printenv test-cgi file to work. I get 500 and error_log has this. [Wed Sep 05 20:44:36 2007] [error] [client 87.66.74.14 http://87.66.74.14] Premature end of script headers: printenv.pl

Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review

2007-09-05 Thread Jorge Schrauwen
On 9/5/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Jorge Schrauwen wrote: I don't have any cgi scripts so I tried to get the printenv test-cgi file to work. I get 500 and error_log has this. [Wed Sep 05 20:44:36 2007] [error] [client 87.66.74.14

Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review

2007-09-05 Thread Jorge Schrauwen
What exectly is not working in mod_perl? my limited mod_perl config is working fine. On 9/5/07, Steffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also mod_perl is not working here with Win32. No indication in the logs. Steffen - Original Message - From: Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review

2007-09-05 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Steffen wrote: With 2.2.6 third party mod mod_fcgid (Fast cgi) is broken. With 2.2.5 RC it was all fine. mod_fcgid is widely used in the community with php. I guess my puzzlement is that the fastcgi model I understand; fork... instantiate child spining cgid listener - on

Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review

2007-09-05 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Jorge Schrauwen wrote: What exectly is not working in mod_perl? my limited mod_perl config is working fine. On 9/5/07, *Steffen* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also mod_perl is not working here with Win32. No indication in the logs. FWIW; I believe I know

[STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed Sep 5 23:48:18 2007

2007-09-05 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2007-09-04 15:49:34 -0400 (Tue, 04 Sep 2007) $] The current version of this file can be found at: * http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS Documentation status is

[STATUS] (httpd-2.2) Wed Sep 5 23:49:27 2007

2007-09-05 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 2.2 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2007-09-05 19:37:58 -0400 (Wed, 05 Sep 2007) $] The current version of this file can be found at: * http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Documentation status is

[STATUS] (httpd-trunk) Wed Sep 5 23:52:46 2007

2007-09-05 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 2.3 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2006-08-22 16:41:03 -0400 (Tue, 22 Aug 2006) $] The current version of this file can be found at: * http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/STATUS Documentation status is maintained