I propose we fix this as attached. I tested this on Fedora 9 and it
works OK. Opinions?
--
Bojan
Index: library/parser_multipart.c
===
--- library/parser_multipart.c (revision 663420)
+++ library/parser_multipart.c (working copy)
@@
--- Bojan Smojver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I propose we fix this as attached. I tested this on
Fedora 9 and it
works OK. Opinions?
Needs a comment in the source about why we're using
volatile here, but otherwise +1.
Hello,
Are there any design documentation (slides, figures, etc.)
available for the mod_proxy module?
I would like to understand its architecture and write
a new URL type handler, similar (but much more simple)
like the mod_proxy_ajp.
Quick google search did not gave any useful results.
Thanks Eric for answer,
No I haven't tried Proxy containers, how can I do this?? Concerning the
module it just a simple one: What I want to do is something like this:
- read request
- read cookie
- decrypt cookie
- if decrypting cookie is OK- I do an *ap_internal_redirect(/auth,r);
*
With in
Hi All,
I am using Apache 2.2 Worker in Red-Hat 3.0.
Following are the behaviors observed in my access logs.
1) Sometime for a particular second there is no entry in the access log
although the server was up and it was fed by HTTP request.
2) Time stamp in the access log entry sometimes come in
hi
i am trying to get mod_rewrite working for my apache server ( apache 2.2.8
).
my virtual host files ( vhost.conf ) looks something like this :
##
NameVirtualHost *:80
VirtualHost *:80
ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 6:20 AM, Agnello George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi
i am trying to get mod_rewrite working for my apache server
This list is for development discussion. Please use the users list:
http://httpd.apache.org/lists.html#http-users
--
Eric Covener
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNI in 2.2.9? (Re: 2.2.9 status)
61495 by: Kaspar Brand
There are just a handful of useful patches in STATUS lacking
a single vote for inclusion in 2.2.9...
While not completely true for the SNI backport proposal (requires more
than a single additional
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 04:42:07PM +0200, Kaspar Brand wrote:
So, is there still hope for SNI being added in 2.2.9...? Let me know if
there's anything else I can do to increase the chances of getting this
proposal accepted.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=662815view=rev
Changing the dirconf
Den Wednesday 04 June 2008 14:06:22 skrev Ian G:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNI in 2.2.9? (Re: 2.2.9 status)
61495 by: Kaspar Brand
FYI. SNI is in Mandriva Linux 2008.1.
--
Regards // Oden Eriksson
Oden Eriksson wrote:
Den Wednesday 04 June 2008 14:06:22 skrev Ian G:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNI in 2.2.9? (Re: 2.2.9 status)
61495 by: Kaspar Brand
FYI. SNI is in Mandriva Linux 2008.1.
Then you should pull it out ASAP, as noted by others the patch currently
in trunk is broken
Joe Orton wrote:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=662815view=rev
Changing the dirconf structure fields in-place seems ugly and may even
be thread-unsafe (not sure).
Thanks for pointing this out, I wasn't aware of the danger of doing so.
The same effect can be achieved with the attached,
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 21:35 -0700, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Needs a comment in the source about why we're using
volatile here, but otherwise +1.
Ah, yes... Sorry. I also need to fix up the comment in the CHANGES file.
--
Bojan
* mod_proxy_http, mod_proxy_ajp, mod_proxy_balancer: Make modules nocanon
aware and do not add the query string again in this case. PR 44803
Given the complexity of this proposal, a rollup patch would be helpful.
14 matches
Mail list logo
